From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E659C001B0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 22:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231400AbjHJWAo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:00:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229907AbjHJWAn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:00:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1149.google.com (mail-yw1-x1149.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1149]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7AB1703 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1149.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-586bd766310so18030757b3.0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:00:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1691704842; x=1692309642; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/wg8VtgMX8ILOvwW4O5m6/zimC62MKue7YdM+m3cFII=; b=fg2wW8aMZzj5Ww2ZG8Vfqn7Wp3d8M9fUKutJiwNaBlDJK9majs0P7HX6R75PHlbnp+ 8qDoHvaW5doe/xTeg3m+Gc3B+4d1JfhNoRhs18rDvUdriniuxrjPj2ZaOeB7hQVGTS7J wMCUN6ArZfhH1FGcgs5VpVgDj2BsamzggoLrKbrEFXOWy754iM6GmVR5EzV6JDqX2xNl G2/am6ZPrwVlu5yG9O6jH8P7vfDFe8vK/k7iwtINxx5FAvLn5jsqAQ4YTmHiBmJkMsAY LeBZzKNVLbDJ4CcxPCHb57mDIRzrCtmgtxn2GVkbLYsZvBtON5egIlXjOIA58PBeaCp2 F7FQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691704842; x=1692309642; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/wg8VtgMX8ILOvwW4O5m6/zimC62MKue7YdM+m3cFII=; b=cIgRlbxAPEoBhYLzPxX49fC1SarBJl+qsu7UM+0LUg8M0TW98ACuVtNja6g79j2LWr XJw7zRMlhCyyEODfJM7hW1kWrhPbH3iz/00VzVf2okAUHjhRAQ/hbyCN4CBJV6elG29o nxGnwf2zNKhQ2guUhzSwy9+h6vH1I9EnHXeGGGrYv+VoApAapF25ufuwnUo2/ES2gNvB 0imEr25T6Cqk+0dkT0KL4js2IHaHJgyuHoOwJu1/f8iDFvzJcg8C9qnwVxrHJTa5LXIE z82//Mk33kOpXvdV0TbTrqIoAF/g6CMvxgl0zkbJuLhi5oywUnI5cqc9s5ShblEyT0TT Id8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyzIrxHHsqNUb/lyGmLdVGW5vCSuhQOrED9g09uaHpAR12f2imu 6WIlXuQv1F75D8aNbj7h5L3aWPf6iks= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFyAauJhDK9Y0tC3tznP2WsmRZFDFJRTw6l8v62bN0sbVAhIm16zHsa5iNCVePH8QukGY8DHrLOx8k= X-Received: from fine.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:2221]) (user=linusa job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:af0f:0:b0:586:4f9e:24a3 with SMTP id n15-20020a81af0f000000b005864f9e24a3mr4132ywh.3.1691704842701; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:00:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230428083528.1699221-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230809171531.2564807-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230809171531.2564807-2-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion From: Linus Arver To: Oswald Buddenhagen , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junio C Hamano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Arver writes: > How about > the following rewording? > > While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is > _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being > reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit). Perhaps In addition, repeatedly reverting the same progression of reverts will or even In addition, repeatedly reverting the same revert chain will is better here?