From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8CFC7EE23 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 05:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233449AbjEBFsP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 01:48:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230484AbjEBFsO (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2023 01:48:14 -0400 Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch (mail-4323.proton.ch [185.70.43.23]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11261FC2 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 22:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 05:48:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nullpo.dev; s=protonmail3; t=1683006489; x=1683265689; bh=10/4DXyBe68seKbDPl3I7gpBI5TuKKGGWOooTjHoYiE=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=sj0TUOD17MLlW1pcWKU8kpMDCyFytsP1G2il0rG/JB9+fBIDixUw8oHP0wkxc69Wi s+wlQ57hVlQxS2tZAL52mZZNcuMNFBEkM0oTdneGoBS+hHszgS4xUqEmmgrk86Vkhe SAKlgqjbGfDwlMAAAi3v7EUb23n3wOlgkIaXyfbfzkNB0/DuFCc3XgzigF5EiPzORf Zk8f/xIGDxlDXtdZJcRnR5GVfDxrS6sU+velEM+m2WbBGinIxkun6Y+eIBaMs3tz+V KyCD1TPd49UEIm7Ji1tOkQbIG8x8R6QxxlY+MR4g/Qa4MmBvrCRsl5s241g3/Kbotf InhP26Q6wcaJw== To: Junio C Hamano From: Jacob Abel Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , Eric Sunshine , Phillip Wood , =?utf-8?Q?Rub=C3=A9n_Justo?= , Taylor Blau , rsbecker@nexbridge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20230417093255.31079-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev> Feedback-ID: 21506737:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 23/05/01 02:51PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Abel writes: > > [...] > > Once the thread is broken, it is broken. You gave a link in the > message I am responding to, to make it easier for people to go back > to earlier iterations and that is good enough, I think. Understood. > > Your eventual v10 can be sent with its cover set as a reply to the > cover of v9 and we will be fine. > > It seems that we may need another iteration, but if I reclal > correctly what remains are all minor issues? > > Thanks. Based on the feedback so far yes. However I have yet to get any reviews on patches 5/8 through 8/8 for this revision so it's unclear to me if they were fine/didn't require any changes or if they just weren't reviewed yet? Also I have yet to hear anything back about whether to keep patches 7/8 and 8/8 in this patchset or break them out into their own followup patchset (original note about this was in the cover letter [1]). 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230417093255.31079-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev/