Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] builtin/add: error out when passing untracked path with -u
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 18:57:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <h7yk7nk7cwyv35reqzfy7brpbn3xoaarhudteyvxfpkodvltt2@eggaahzrjryq> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh6gnmzqs.fsf@gitster.g>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> So, it was a fairly pointless thing that I was wondering about.  The
> current behaviour, and the new behaviour with the new check, are
> fine as-is.

Well I think we should be going 'all-or-none' way as I can't think of
any major user-facing command that does partial changes incase of
error (besides two testcase below).

> If we wanted to make it "all-or-none", I think the way to do so is
> to tweak the final part of the cmd_add() function to skip committing
> the updated index, e.g.,
> 
>          finish:
>         -	if (write_locked_index(&the_index, &lock_file,
>         +	if (exit_status)
>         +		fputs(_("not updating the index due to failure(s)\n"), stderr);
>         +	else if (write_locked_index(&the_index, &lock_file,
>                                        COMMIT_LOCK | SKIP_IF_UNCHANGED))
>                         die(_("unable to write new index file"));
>  
> And if/when we do so, the existing code (with or without the updates
> made by the topic under discussion) needs no change.  We can do all
> steps regardless of the errors we notice along the way with earlier
> steps, and discard the in-core index if we saw any errors.

Doing this, we would need to take care of atleast 4 tests breaking in
t3700-add:
 error out when attempting to add ignored ones but add others
 git add --ignore-errors
 git add (add.ignore-errors)
 git add --chmod fails with non regular files (but updates the other paths)

while ignore-errors ones would be trivial to fix, fixing other 2 would
probably require some more than trivial code changes, as from the title,
their behavior seems pretty much set in stone. That's why I did the
'goto cleanup' approach to not break these.

Thanks.

> The renormalize() thing is not noticing unused pathspec elements,
> which we might want to fix, but I suspect it is far less commonly
> used mode of operation, so it may be OK to leave it to future
> follow-up series.
> 
> Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-01 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18 15:51 [PATCH 0/2] fix certain cases of add and commit with untracked path not erroring out Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-18 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin/commit: error out when passing untracked path with -i Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-18 17:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-18 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] builtin/add: error out when passing untracked path with -u Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-18 17:31   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-29 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] commit, add: error out when passing untracked path Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:36   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] commit, add: error out when passing untracked paths Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-03 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 0/3] commit,add: error out when passing untracked path Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-03 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 1/3] revision: optionally record matches with pathspec elements Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-03 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 2/3] builtin/commit: error out when passing untracked path with -i Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-03 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 3/3] builtin/add: error out when passing untracked path with -u Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:36   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] revision: optionally record matches with pathspec elements Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:36   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] builtin/commit: error out when passing untracked path with -i Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-02 21:58       ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:36   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] builtin/add: error out when passing untracked path with -u Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-04-02 21:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-02 22:00       ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-29 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] read-cache: optionally collect pathspec matching info Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-29 21:35   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-29 22:16     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-30 14:27       ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-30 16:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-29 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] builtin/commit: error out when passing untracked path with -i Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-29 21:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-29 20:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] builtin/add: error out when passing untracked path with -u Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-29 21:43   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-30 14:18     ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-30 16:49       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-01 13:27         ` Ghanshyam Thakkar [this message]
2024-04-01 16:31           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=h7yk7nk7cwyv35reqzfy7brpbn3xoaarhudteyvxfpkodvltt2@eggaahzrjryq \
    --to=shyamthakkar001@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).