From: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk, "herr.kaste" <herr.kaste@gmail.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
erik@cervined.in
Subject: Re: rebase -i --update-refs can lead to deletion of branches
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:28:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf5bc739-cb88-61ff-ed6b-09b1316f2f35@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c195b67c-4dbc-a8b8-8513-2664e1ca2404@dunelm.org.uk>
Phillip Wood wrote:
> We should be removing the entry entirely if the user removes it from the
> todo-list see b3b1a21d1a (sequencer: rewrite update-refs as user edits
> todo list, 2022-07-19) where the commit message says
>
> 1. If a '<ref>/<before>/<after>' triple in the update-refs file does not
> have a matching 'update-ref <ref>' command in the todo-list _and_ the
> <after> value is the null OID, then remove that triple. Here, the
> user removed the 'update-ref <ref>' command before it was executed,
> since if it was executed then the <after> value would store the
> commit at that position.
>
> I think that is the best approach but it seems the implementation isn't
> actually doing that.
Thanks for pointing this out. This approach seems to have only been applied
to 'git rebase --edit-todo', so ideally the fix will just be "do the same
thing in the initial rebase."
I got sidetracked yesterday and didn't get as much time to work on this as
I'd liked, but I should be able to send a patch today.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-04 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 17:01 rebase -i --update-refs can lead to deletion of branches herr.kaste
2022-10-20 20:49 ` Erik Cervin Edin
2022-11-03 9:32 ` Phillip Wood
2022-11-03 15:25 ` herr.kaste
2022-11-03 16:52 ` Erik Cervin Edin
2022-11-04 0:31 ` Victoria Dye
2022-11-04 10:40 ` Phillip Wood
2022-11-04 15:28 ` Victoria Dye [this message]
2022-11-04 16:57 ` [PATCH] rebase --update-refs: avoid unintended ref deletion Victoria Dye
2022-11-04 19:44 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-04 20:17 ` Phillip Wood
2022-11-04 20:12 ` Phillip Wood
2022-11-07 2:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-11-07 17:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Victoria Dye
2022-11-07 19:17 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-07 19:25 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-11-08 9:58 ` Phillip Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf5bc739-cb88-61ff-ed6b-09b1316f2f35@github.com \
--to=vdye@github.com \
--cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=erik@cervined.in \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=herr.kaste@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).