From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-8fab.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-8fab.mail.infomaniak.ch [83.166.143.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F2B71733 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.166.143.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712266684; cv=none; b=afYe1T25uKDME1ipQeWARcBMzls1SIAYj+n7ppRLOQpZXhH48z7X4K7vDdkHu+VXr/z/zpVnhnKYSgSLgIWO9YNXPO1WdJC+7EGFmbFDDnw4Lsm3WZVuuP2ZrUj0TyAKZHReS/oLxDfXGsdjbcCOlkS4dA0pSEr9/acv5hY+BD0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712266684; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ImlHVbEcu2+DaRMdppBxCCHS8unO2qIpsg64Iz82xMY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ez+wtk0iLe7Qmw+2edDDGqOa/pxGsR2SQhMSpe7EYIlvat00hJ3NZP9JsXVvihdMpAYS3RoJX4YoluJIMxXcCiFI2T3nYUH3KnUNAjje31jAiS0HEUNyjIoUOq6zns91Lbq39Q22PUBjIwsUNkceHKKwN2O7fJvezmvjcPcB8Ew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=badez.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=badez.eu; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=badez.eu header.i=@badez.eu header.b=nTHFWL07; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.166.143.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=badez.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=badez.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=badez.eu header.i=@badez.eu header.b="nTHFWL07" Received: from smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.4.36.107]) by smtp-4-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V9ZjH01Wtzj85; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:37:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=badez.eu; s=20230704; t=1712266674; bh=ImlHVbEcu2+DaRMdppBxCCHS8unO2qIpsg64Iz82xMY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=nTHFWL071sPkDqWzQNDZfqTlBGEyTRgVx4shJrd0SeNR2WZS1zcOYx7Ff1wXRZ4pe rZq16LW3frdkiiJR/pQbK5+y/yvEc/X9yBeuGIMyc6q9WAS5YGihv5tHorlGdGM00l /ov5julTa2Y9R4nL9yECN60vPr7vp6psaohBRxwiI+9E29uMTIQoNQMXfhO1xZ1Luw btinqxGbMYtW3Py/b0Cf+MCA/toB+zx25oBk70OnN7NXvvHUPIWZuZlLK2FLz8j+vu 7kvmFQoWrGADZr9FqPQfrVzPt5yM6qQMCnptOQgX9n5nGa4YNfuGVRZaKVY8WHLmif YUhouGhNdtXtA== Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4V9ZjG3MHRz9BQ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:37:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:37:53 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Git log --decorate show prefetch objects To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee References: <5a16d4e3-6fa4-45f3-ae79-576f3fa80d44@badez.eu> Content-Language: fr From: Alexandre Badez In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha On 04/04/2024 18:56, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Alexandre Badez writes: > >> # What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue) >> >> > branches and/or objects> >> >> git maintenance run --task=prefetch >> >> git log --oneline --decorate --all --graph > I do not use the prefetch stuff, but unfortunately the person who > was most familiar with "maintenance" are no longer active on this > list, so let me take a crack. > > I think your complaint is that "--all" really means "all", not just > "heads" and "tags" but also includes "prefetch", while the prefetch > hierarchy is not included in the "--decorate" sources. > > What does > > $ git log --oneline --branches --tags --decorate --graph > > show, and is it closer to what you expected (note: this is not a > direct suggestion of a workaround---trying to gauge what the > direction is to move forward)? > > Thanks. Indeed, I missed the --branches (and --remotes) options; they do a better job in my case. Maybe --all have a "legacy behaviour" so it's on me to move to new and better options. Thanks.