Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, tao@klerks.biz, newren@gmail.com,
	phillip.wood123@gmail.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rebase: add a --rebase-merges=drop option
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:08:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a856dd16-9876-509b-6a99-11ea0020633c@iee.email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr0ukggk5.fsf@gitster.g>

Hi Junio,

On 20/02/2023 21:42, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Name the new option "drop" intead of "no" or "false" to avoid confusion
> This is traditionally called "flattening the history".  Don't we
> confuse uesrs by introducing a new phrase?

While "flatten.." is used on list, we rarely mention it in our man
pages, and usually only in a cautionary manner via the
rev-list-options.txt under "--show-linear-break".

It's not always clear what is meant by 'flattening' and which aspects
are included/excluded from the flattened display. I suspect that a
recent question on the git-users list [1] originates from the same
confusions.

Maybe it's something that could be included in the Glossary to
supplement the not well known how-to discussion in
keep-canonical-history-correct.txt

>
> rebase-merges is about transplanting the history without flattening,
> i.e. keeping the mergy commit graph topology.  If there are only two
> kinds of rebase (i.e. keeping the topology which is rebase-merges
> and the other "flattening" kind) operation, shouldn't the option be
> called "--no-rebase-merges" instead?  --rebase-merges=no is also
> understandable.
>
>> in the future if --rebase-merges grows the ability to truly "rebase"
>> merge commits by reusing the conflict resolution information from the
>> original merge commit, and we want to add an option to ignore the
>> conflict resolution information.
> I am not sure why such a change "in the future" is not merely a
> bugfix of the current "--rebase-merges", though.  Once it is fixed,
> is there a reason to make the fixed behaviour only available behind
> an option?
[1]
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/057bd9e2-b20b-4794-b8a0-bc16ede374c1n%40googlegroups.com

--

Philip


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-21 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-20  3:32 [PATCH 1/2] rebase: add a --rebase-merges=drop option Alex Henrie
2023-02-20  3:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] rebase: add a config option for --rebase-merges Alex Henrie
2023-02-20  9:38   ` Phillip Wood
2023-02-20 17:06     ` Alex Henrie
2023-02-20 16:41   ` Elijah Newren
2023-02-20  9:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] rebase: add a --rebase-merges=drop option Phillip Wood
2023-02-20 17:03   ` Alex Henrie
2023-02-20 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-02-21 16:08   ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2023-02-21 18:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-13 16:51       ` [PATCH 0/1] cover-letter: flatten Philip Oakley
2023-05-13 16:56       ` [PATCH 1/1] doc: Glossary, describe Flattening Philip Oakley
2023-05-15  6:59         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-27 16:28           ` Philip Oakley
2023-05-19 21:35         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2023-05-27 16:46           ` Philip Oakley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a856dd16-9876-509b-6a99-11ea0020633c@iee.email \
    --to=philipoakley@iee.email \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=tao@klerks.biz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).