From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Xing Xin <bupt_xingxin@163.com>
Cc: Xing Xin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Xing Xin <xingxin.xx@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] unbundle: introduce unbundle_fsck_flags for fsckobjects handling
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 06:38:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlgC2TaXGjcNv2C0@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d097be.b642.18fc58dfb70.Coremail.bupt_xingxin@163.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:12:47AM +0800, Xing Xin wrote:
> At 2024-05-28 20:03:25, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> >On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:41:55PM +0000, Xing Xin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> >[snip]
> >> diff --git a/bundle.h b/bundle.h
> >> index 021adbdcbb3..cfa9daddda6 100644
> >> --- a/bundle.h
> >> +++ b/bundle.h
> >> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ int create_bundle(struct repository *r, const char *path,
> >> int argc, const char **argv, struct strvec *pack_options,
> >> int version);
> >>
> >> +enum unbundle_fsck_flags {
> >> + UNBUNDLE_FSCK_NEVER = 0,
> >> + UNBUNDLE_FSCK_ALWAYS,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> enum verify_bundle_flags {
> >> VERIFY_BUNDLE_VERBOSE = (1 << 0),
> >> VERIFY_BUNDLE_QUIET = (1 << 1),
> >
> >Wouldn't this have been a natural fit for the new flag, e.g. via
> >something like `VERIFY_BUNDLE_FSCK`?
>
> It makes sense to me. Currently, verify_bundle_flags controls the amount
> of information displayed when checking a bundle's prerequisites. The
> newly added unbundle_fsck_flags is designed to check for broken objects
> during the unbundle process, which is essentially a form of bundle
> verification. I believe we should extend some object verification
> capabilities to the git bundle verify command as well, perhaps by adding
> a --fsck-objects option.
>
> With this in mind, I support adding new options to verify_bundle_flags.
> Since bundle.c:unbundle needs to combine multiple options, we must
> define new options using bitwise shifting:
>
> enum verify_bundle_flags {
> VERIFY_BUNDLE_VERBOSE = (1 << 0),
> VERIFY_BUNDLE_QUIET = (1 << 1),
> VERIFY_BUNDLE_FSCK_OBJECTS_ALWAYS = (1 << 2),
> VERIFY_BUNDLE_FSCK_OBJECTS_FOLLOW_FETCH = (1 << 3),
> };
>
> How about the naming? I'm not very good at naming :)
I later noticed that you extend the `unbundle_fsck_flags` in a later
patch. With that in mind I don't think it's all that important anymore
to merge those into the `verify_bundle_flags` as you would otherwise
allow for weirdness. What happens for example when both `ALWAYS` and
`FOLLOW_FETCH` are set?
So feel free to ignore this advice. If you still think it's a good idea
then the above naming looks okay to me.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-30 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-15 3:01 [PATCH] bundle-uri: refresh packed_git if unbundle succeed blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-05-17 5:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-20 11:48 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-20 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-27 16:04 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-20 9:41 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-17 7:36 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-20 10:19 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-20 12:36 ` [PATCH v2] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-05-21 15:41 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-05-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 11:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-30 8:32 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] unbundle: introduce unbundle_fsck_flags for fsckobjects handling Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 12:03 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-29 18:12 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-30 4:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-05-30 8:46 ` Re:Re: " Xing Xin
2024-05-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 12:03 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-28 17:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-28 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-29 5:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-30 8:48 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-29 5:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] unbundle: introduce new option UNBUNDLE_FSCK_FOLLOW_FETCH Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-28 12:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-30 8:54 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-05-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] unbundle: extend verify_bundle_flags to support fsck-objects Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-06 12:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-06-11 6:46 ` Xing Xin
2024-05-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-05-30 8:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] unbundle: introduce option VERIFY_BUNDLE_FSCK_FOLLOW_FETCH Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-06 12:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-06-11 6:46 ` Xing Xin
2024-06-11 6:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 6:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 6:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 6:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] unbundle: extend options to support object verification Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 9:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-06-11 12:47 ` Xing Xin
2024-06-11 6:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] unbundle: use VERIFY_BUNDLE_FSCK_FOLLOW_FETCH for fetches Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 19:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-17 13:53 ` Xing Xin
2024-06-11 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 19:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-11 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] unbundle: support object verification for fetches Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-11 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-12 18:33 ` Xing Xin
2024-06-11 13:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches Patrick Steinhardt
2024-06-17 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 " blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-06-17 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-18 17:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-19 6:30 ` Xing Xin
2024-06-17 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-17 13:55 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] unbundle: extend object verification for fetches Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] object checking related additions and fixes for bundles in fetches blanet via GitGitGadget
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] bundle-uri: verify oid before writing refs Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] fetch-pack: expose fsckObjects configuration logic Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] unbundle: extend object verification for fetches Xing Xin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlgC2TaXGjcNv2C0@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=bupt_xingxin@163.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=xingxin.xx@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).