From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8871EB64DD for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236622AbjHKRNL (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:13:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40936 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230160AbjHKRNK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:13:10 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (bluemchen.kde.org [209.51.188.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 722A2E5F for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC2820386; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 13:13:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1qUVhB-erh-00; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:13:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:13:05 +0200 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Phillip Wood , git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts Message-ID: References: <20230428083528.1699221-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <20230809171531.2564807-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:59:34AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Presumably the next time this gets reverted we will see a doubled >reapply? > yes >Isn't that something we care about documenting as a part >of this test? i.e. another four-line block after the above? > the third case documents that it's the same as the first case, i.e., "nothing special". so at this point we have full coverage in all regards. going beyond that would be redundant, and we'd again get into the "uh, where do we stop?" situation. regards