From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703AFC001DE for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235083AbjG1Jpp (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 05:45:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54810 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232982AbjG1Jpn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 05:45:43 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (bluemchen.kde.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:8::100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E12622686 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 02:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380B7241EF; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 05:45:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1qPK2T-UJ8-00; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:45:37 +0200 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:45:37 +0200 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: Linus Arver Cc: Junio C Hamano , Phillip Wood , git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts Message-ID: References: <20230428083528.1699221-1-oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> <3f5e4116-54e6-9753-f925-ed4a9f6e3518@gmail.com> <2d416834-ef3e-01a2-6be0-9e88bc0de25e@gmail.com> <10523968-0f02-f483-69c4-24e62e839f70@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:26:01PM -0700, Linus Arver wrote: >How about introducing a suffix (+ or -) after the word "Revert" to >indicate the application/inclusion (+) or removal (-) of a commit? > i think that falls squarely into the "too nerdy" category, like the Revert^n proposal does. >(Sorry for jumping into this thread so late, but the mention of this >topic on the recent "What's cooking" message [1] (that this topic would >be discarded) got me interested.) > i actually have finally updated my patches, but then found a problem in my script i'm using for submitting them, and want to fix that first for dogfooding purposes. shouldn't be long. regards