On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:47:14PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote: > > @@ -384,6 +390,11 @@ notdir SP LF > > is printed when, during symlink resolution, a file is used as a > > directory name. > > > > +Alternatively, when `-Z` is passed, the line feeds in any of the above examples > > +are replaced with NUL terminators. This ensures that output will be parsable if > > +the output itself would contain a linefeed and is thus recommended for > > +scripting purposes. > > + > > CAVEATS > > ------- > > > > diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c > > index 001dcb24d6..90ef407d30 100644 > > --- a/builtin/cat-file.c > > +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c > > @@ -492,17 +494,18 @@ static void batch_object_write(const char *obj_name, > > strbuf_reset(scratch); > > > > if (!opt->format) { > > - print_default_format(scratch, data); > > + print_default_format(scratch, data, opt); > > } else { > > strbuf_expand(scratch, opt->format, expand_format, data); > > - strbuf_addch(scratch, '\n'); > > + strbuf_addch(scratch, opt->output_delim); > > } > > > > batch_write(opt, scratch->buf, scratch->len); > > > > if (opt->batch_mode == BATCH_MODE_CONTENTS) { > > + char buf[] = {opt->output_delim}; > > I found this a bit confusing, I think it would be clearer just to do > > batch_write(opt, &opt->output_delim, 1); Agreed, that's cleaner. > > print_object_or_die(opt, data); > > - batch_write(opt, "\n", 1); > > + batch_write(opt, buf, 1); > > } > > } > > > @@ -920,7 +927,7 @@ int cmd_cat_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > N_("git cat-file (-t | -s) [--allow-unknown-type] "), > > N_("git cat-file (--batch | --batch-check | --batch-command) [--batch-all-objects]\n" > > " [--buffer] [--follow-symlinks] [--unordered]\n" > > - " [--textconv | --filters] [-z]"), > > + " [--textconv | --filters] [-z] [-Z]"), > > If we're recommending that people don't use '-z' then maybe we should > remove it from the synopsis and add OPT_HIDDEN to it below. I might still change this depending on the conclusion Junio and I will arrive at, but for now I agree that this makes sense. > > N_("git cat-file (--textconv | --filters)\n" > > " [: | --path= ]"), > > NULL > > @@ -950,6 +957,7 @@ int cmd_cat_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > PARSE_OPT_OPTARG | PARSE_OPT_NONEG, > > batch_option_callback), > > OPT_BOOL('z', NULL, &input_nul_terminated, N_("stdin is NUL-terminated")), > > + OPT_BOOL('Z', NULL, &nul_terminated, N_("stdin and stdout is NUL-terminated")), > > > diff --git a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh > > index 7b985cfded..d73a0be1b9 100755 > > --- a/t/t1006-cat-file.sh > > +++ b/t/t1006-cat-file.sh > > @@ -392,17 +393,18 @@ deadbeef > > > > " > > > > -batch_output="$hello_sha1 blob $hello_size > > -$hello_content > > -$commit_sha1 commit $commit_size > > -$commit_content > > -$tag_sha1 tag $tag_size > > -$tag_content > > -deadbeef missing > > - missing" > > +printf "%s\0" \ > > + "$hello_sha1 blob $hello_size" \ > > + "$hello_content" \ > > + "$commit_sha1 commit $commit_size" \ > > + "$commit_content" \ > > + "$tag_sha1 tag $tag_size" \ > > + "$tag_content" \ > > + "deadbeef missing" \ > > + " missing" >batch_output > > I think writing the expected output to a file is a good change as we > always use it with test_cmp. As "-z" is deprecated I think it makes > sense to model the expected output for "-Z" and use tr for the "-z" > tests as you have done here. It looks like we have good coverage of the > new option. It's actually also required in order to not have to specify the expected output twice. While we could leave this as-is, translating it to be NUL terminated via `tr \n \0` doesn't work as the output contains newlines in places where we don't want to translate them to NUL delimiters. And storing the NUL-delimited string in a variable doesn't work either as shells will truncate the C strings. Thanks for your review! Patrick