Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] string-list: introduce `string_list_split_in_place_multi()`
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:54:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZD8Df1iZaUGzodrg@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqleipc73v.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:39:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
>
> > Introduce a variant of the `string_list_split_in_place()` function that
> > takes a string of accepted delimiters.
> >
> > By contrast to its cousin `string_list_split_in_place()` which splits
> > the given string at every instance of the single character `delim`, the
> > `_multi` variant splits the given string any any character appearing in
> > the string `delim`.
> >
> > Like `strtok()`, the `_multi` variant skips past sequential delimiting
> > characters. For example:
> >
> >     string_list_split_in_place(&xs, xstrdup("foo::bar::baz"), ":", -1);
> >
> > would place in `xs` the elements "foo", "bar", and "baz".
>
> strtok() also skips leading and trailing delimiters, i.e. the above
> will give you identical result for ":foo:bar:baz:".

I'm not sure the results are identical. Adding this test case for
testing the behavior of string_list_split_in_place() passes before and
after this series:

--- 8< ---
diff --git a/t/t0063-string-list.sh b/t/t0063-string-list.sh
index 9c5094616a..dfe970a566 100755
--- a/t/t0063-string-list.sh
+++ b/t/t0063-string-list.sh
@@ -72,6 +72,15 @@ test_split ":" ":" "-1" <<EOF
 [1]: ""
 EOF

+test_split ":foo:bar:baz:" ":" "-1" <<-\EOF
+5
+[0]: ""
+[1]: "foo"
+[2]: "bar"
+[3]: "baz"
+[4]: ""
+EOF
+
 test_split_in_place_multi "foo:;:bar:;:baz" ":;" "-1" <<-\EOF
 3
 [0]: "foo"
--- >8 ---

> It would be useful to test that here in addition to the existing ones.

Sure. FWIW, the behavior for string_list_split_in_place_multi() is
slightly different, since it will eat up all of the leading delimiter
tokens and treat the first token as "foo".

Here's a diff that could be squashed into this patch which captures both
cases:

--- 8< ---
diff --git a/t/t0063-string-list.sh b/t/t0063-string-list.sh
index 9c5094616a..efc84dc124 100755
--- a/t/t0063-string-list.sh
+++ b/t/t0063-string-list.sh
@@ -72,6 +72,15 @@ test_split ":" ":" "-1" <<EOF
 [1]: ""
 EOF

+test_split ":foo:bar:baz:" ":" "-1" <<-\EOF
+5
+[0]: ""
+[1]: "foo"
+[2]: "bar"
+[3]: "baz"
+[4]: ""
+EOF
+
 test_split_in_place_multi "foo:;:bar:;:baz" ":;" "-1" <<-\EOF
 3
 [0]: "foo"
@@ -104,6 +113,14 @@ test_split_in_place_multi "foo:;:bar:;:" ":;" "-1" <<-\EOF
 [2]: ""
 EOF

+test_split_in_place_multi ":;:foo:;:bar:;:baz:;:" ":;" "-1" <<-\EOF
+4
+[0]: "foo"
+[1]: "bar"
+[2]: "baz"
+[3]: ""
+EOF
+
 test_expect_success "test filter_string_list" '
 	test "x-" = "x$(test-tool string-list filter - y)" &&
 	test "x-" = "x$(test-tool string-list filter no y)" &&
--- >8 ---


Thanks,
Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13 23:31 [PATCH 0/5] banned: mark `strok()`, `strtok_r()` as banned Taylor Blau
2023-04-13 23:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] string-list: introduce `string_list_split_in_place_multi()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:10   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 17:08     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-13 23:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] t/helper/test-hashmap.c: avoid using `strtok()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 10:23   ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 18:06     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-13 23:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] t/helper/test-oidmap.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-13 23:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] t/helper/test-json-writer.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-13 23:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] banned.h: mark `strtok()`, `strtok_r()` as banned Taylor Blau
2023-04-14  1:39   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-14  2:08     ` Chris Torek
2023-04-14 13:41     ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] banned: mark `strok()` " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] string-list: introduce `string_list_split_in_place_multi()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-18 20:54       ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2023-04-22 11:12     ` Jeff King
2023-04-22 15:53       ` René Scharfe
2023-04-23  0:35         ` Jeff King
2023-04-24 16:24           ` Junio C Hamano
2023-04-23  2:38       ` [PATCH v2 1/6] string-list: introduce `string_list_split_in_place_multi()`t Taylor Blau
2023-04-23  2:40         ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] string-list: introduce `string_list_setlen()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-22 11:14     ` Jeff King
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] t/helper/test-hashmap.c: avoid using `strtok()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-22 11:16     ` Jeff King
2023-04-24 21:19       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] t/helper/test-oidmap.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] t/helper/test-json-writer.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] banned.h: mark `strtok()` as banned Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] banned: mark `strok()`, `strtok_r()` " Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 1/6] string-list: multi-delimiter `string_list_split_in_place()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 2/6] string-list: introduce `string_list_setlen()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-25  6:21     ` Jeff King
2023-04-25 21:00       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 3/6] t/helper/test-hashmap.c: avoid using `strtok()` Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 4/6] t/helper/test-oidmap.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 5/6] t/helper/test-json-writer.c: " Taylor Blau
2023-04-25 13:57     ` Jeff Hostetler
2023-04-24 22:20   ` [PATCH v3 6/6] banned.h: mark `strtok()` and `strtok_r()` as banned Taylor Blau
2023-04-24 22:25     ` Chris Torek
2023-04-24 23:00       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-25  6:26     ` Jeff King
2023-04-25 21:02       ` Taylor Blau
2023-04-25  6:27   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] banned: mark `strok()`, " Jeff King
2023-04-25 21:03     ` Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZD8Df1iZaUGzodrg@nand.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=chris.torek@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).