Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in `git branch --delete main` when on other orphan branch
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 06:15:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2DxxZAFbN8juHY6@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAESOdVBpsbJ0obD=qDjHBJg-wwWUL5sQ-7X_h13Vw39Q9QUzHA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 10:46:37PM -0700, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:

> I did this:
> git init test
> cd test
> echo a > file
> git add file
> git commit -m a
> git checkout --orphan other
> git branch --delete main
> 
> The last command fails with:
> fatal: Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD
> 
> That's a bug, right? I can of course work around it with `rm
> .git/refs/heads/main`.

Sort of. This is part of the "is the thing we are deleting merged into
HEAD" check. It tries to look up the HEAD and calls die() when it can't.
The more correct thing, I think, would be for it to just return "nope,
there is no HEAD so nothing is merged into it".

But that probably won't make your command succeed; you'll just get:

  error: The branch 'main' is not fully merged.

At which point you'd retry with "-f" (or "-D"). And then it succeeds,
because the force path is smart enough to skip loading HEAD, from
67affd5173 (git-branch -D: make it work even when on a yet-to-be-born
branch, 2006-11-24).

At the time, I suspect that logic was "good enough". You'd need "-f"
either way, so it is really just a question of producing a lousy error
message.

But since then, I think there are more cases. For example, 99c419c915
(branch -d: base the "already-merged" safety on the branch it merges
with, 2009-12-29) makes it OK to delete the branch if it's merged to
HEAD _or_ to its upstream. You don't have an upstream in your example,
but it's not hard to imagine one (just start the repo via "clone" rather
than from scratch).

And in that case I think the HEAD check calling die() is actively doing
the wrong thing, and would prevent an otherwise successful deletion.

The fix might be as simple as:

diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
index 15be0c03ef..f6ff9084c8 100644
--- a/builtin/branch.c
+++ b/builtin/branch.c
@@ -235,11 +235,8 @@ static int delete_branches(int argc, const char **argv, int force, int kinds,
 	}
 	branch_name_pos = strcspn(fmt, "%");
 
-	if (!force) {
+	if (!force)
 		head_rev = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, &head_oid);
-		if (!head_rev)
-			die(_("Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD"));
-	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < argc; i++, strbuf_reset(&bname)) {
 		char *target = NULL;

as the later code seems to do the right thing with the NULL head_rev. It
would definitely need more careful investigation (and tests!) to confirm
that, though.

And in the meantime, hopefully you noticed that "-f" is a better
workaround than manually deleting the refs file. :)

-Peff


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-29  5:46 Bug in `git branch --delete main` when on other orphan branch Martin von Zweigbergk
2022-11-01 10:15 ` Jeff King [this message]
2022-11-01 15:31   ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2022-11-01 20:12   ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 20:14     ` Bug in `git branch --delete main` when on other orphan brancht Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 21:45       ` Jeff King
2022-11-02  0:59         ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 20:32     ` [PATCH] branch: gracefully handle '-d' on detached HEAD Taylor Blau
2022-11-02  5:27       ` [PATCH v2] branch: gracefully handle '-d' on orphan HEAD Jeff King
2022-11-04  1:26         ` Rubén Justo
2022-11-04  5:36           ` Jeff King
2022-11-06 22:22             ` Rubén Justo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2DxxZAFbN8juHY6@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=martinvonz@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).