From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] connected: allow supplying different view of reachable objects
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:10:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1/JOGihHtMWv240@ncase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr0yrizqm.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2195 bytes --]
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:12:33AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/connected.c b/connected.c
> > index 74a20cb32e..2a4c4e0025 100644
> > --- a/connected.c
> > +++ b/connected.c
> > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data,
> > strvec_push(&rev_list.args, "--stdin");
> > if (has_promisor_remote())
> > strvec_push(&rev_list.args, "--exclude-promisor-objects");
> > - if (!opt->is_deepening_fetch) {
> > + if (!opt->is_deepening_fetch && !opt->reachable_oids_fn) {
> > strvec_push(&rev_list.args, "--not");
> > strvec_push(&rev_list.args, "--all");
> > }
> > @@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data,
> >
> > rev_list_in = xfdopen(rev_list.in, "w");
> >
> > + if (opt->reachable_oids_fn) {
> > + const struct object_id *reachable_oid;
> > + while ((reachable_oid = opt->reachable_oids_fn(opt->reachable_oids_data)) != NULL)
> > + if (fprintf(rev_list_in, "^%s\n", oid_to_hex(reachable_oid)) < 0)
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> It is good that these individual negative references are fed from
> the standard input, not on the command line, as they can be many.
>
> In the original code without the reachable_oids_fn, we refrain from
> excluding when the is_deepening_fetch bit is set, but here we do not
> pay attention to the bit at all. Is that sensible, and if so why?
Hm, good point. On a deepening fetch the commits that were the previous
boundary will likely get replaced by new commits that are at a deeper
point in history, so they cannot be used as a well-defined boundary.
Instead, we do a complete graph-walk that doesn't stop at any previously
known commits at all. At least that's how I understand the code, the
explanation is likely a bit fuzzy.
I guess we should thus also pay attention to `is_deepening_fetch` here.
As this means that `is_deepening_fetch` and `reachable_oids_fn` are
mutually exclusive I'm inclined to go even further and `die()` if both
are set at the same time. We only adapt git-receive-pack(1) anyway, so
we should never run into this situation for now.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 14:42 [PATCH 0/2] receive-pack: use advertised reference tips to inform connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-10-28 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] connected: allow supplying different view of reachable objects Patrick Steinhardt
2022-10-28 14:54 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-28 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-30 18:49 ` Taylor Blau
2022-10-31 13:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2022-11-01 1:16 ` Taylor Blau
2022-10-28 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] receive-pack: use advertised reference tips to inform connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-10-28 15:01 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-31 14:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-10-31 15:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-30 19:09 ` Taylor Blau
2022-10-31 14:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-01 1:28 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 7:20 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-01 11:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-02 1:05 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 8:28 ` Jeff King
2022-10-28 16:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
2022-11-01 1:30 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-01 9:00 ` Jeff King
2022-11-01 11:49 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-03 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] receive-pack: only use visible refs for " Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-03 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] refs: get rid of global list of hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-03 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] revision: add new parameter to specify all visible refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-05 12:46 ` Jeff King
2022-11-07 8:20 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 14:32 ` Jeff King
2022-11-05 12:55 ` Jeff King
2022-11-03 14:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-05 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Taylor Blau
2022-11-05 12:55 ` Jeff King
2022-11-05 12:52 ` Jeff King
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] refs: get rid of global list of hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] revision: move together exclusion-related functions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] revision: introduce struct to handle exclusions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 12:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-08 9:11 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] revision: add new parameter to exclude hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-07 13:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-07 17:07 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-08 9:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 9:22 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 0:57 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-08 8:16 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 14:42 ` Jeff King
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] revparse: add `--exclude-hidden=` option Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 14:44 ` Jeff King
2022-11-07 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 0:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Taylor Blau
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 " Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] refs: get rid of global list of hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 13:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-08 14:49 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 14:51 ` Jeff King
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] revision: move together exclusion-related functions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] revision: introduce struct to handle exclusions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] revision: add new parameter to exclude hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 15:07 ` Jeff King
2022-11-08 21:13 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-11 5:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] rev-parse: add `--exclude-hidden=` option Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-08 10:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] refs: fix memory leak when parsing hideRefs config Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] refs: get rid of global list of hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] revision: move together exclusion-related functions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] revision: introduce struct to handle exclusions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] revision: add new parameter to exclude hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] rev-parse: add `--exclude-hidden=` option Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 6:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-11 22:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] " Taylor Blau
2022-11-15 17:26 ` Jeff King
2022-11-16 21:22 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-16 22:04 ` Jeff King
2022-11-16 22:33 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-17 5:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 " Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] refs: fix memory leak when parsing hideRefs config Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] refs: get rid of global list of hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] revision: move together exclusion-related functions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] revision: introduce struct to handle exclusions Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:46 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] revision: add new parameter to exclude hidden refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:47 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] rev-parse: add `--exclude-hidden=` option Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 5:47 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity check Patrick Steinhardt
2022-11-17 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] " Jeff King
2022-11-17 21:24 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1/JOGihHtMWv240@ncase \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).