From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B98C433FE for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 00:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229882AbiJQAel (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:34:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57928 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229883AbiJQAek (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 20:34:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C11D3175A8 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id a6-20020a17090abe0600b0020d7c0c6650so12824375pjs.0 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FGBVFl7Bzj3YOn34TKhmKJZtYdSZ+wWVX8Gm00nXeNM=; b=f963zn5D1kqLYWnWbVQRxDreHAPo2RjaPnsDqBvGnLYKpgr5n/JvUYZSUglHV9oVfE tRb274rT6zshVgVtUEjxEeoaqQjsCdA1I0NNUYqu2qMM0xWZJvUzw3kiwCsf6Gue88R1 HNwKOctECc63NkGLHwZmjbgzYlEXgkmPLDFir7yBfcmF4qf1lyCKr45bDoH7KosRXbHG qqLZxihF7FhFDFLPxhXzCFpvzaNHaJdUp8dKP67jKFj3NZTZ7ztucC4SxQbHTPeTfq7a gZydqC62IgbA/Mipirha6J387iN5skQ0eyYaX6ImQfsc/DcbK3UyTYBQisR+vBjNsp3F meBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FGBVFl7Bzj3YOn34TKhmKJZtYdSZ+wWVX8Gm00nXeNM=; b=Io13Cwec23X/cwBwoHonQpNsGKeViV1OXJpDAXvSIALBJQoczOqlzqPGoCdr8NuZ5j u+8MZmNFPiuKaUYXPF3V0B9/ogxsM7DG+dgdyl+rLTeB0WcNW3kud/0FWvwH5uQ1hj9q BrL++zAgXUvqWQdtjzvxcyrfCsnwpwbDdy/mEL7eIoOZEQnTYf03KgvYM+pLkkYgdPiq DQis7vPcodte/clQP6OrxtIF1toGUaEL+zkxBKrYz/FQp7MKLP0fKosMGDUBulvJe1d4 vLqeMeVJPLFx+9tqx0/BjIV0j47caezAYI6mLObIHooCaSXrnLjxjzk0y5RBeLnMXhwF TYKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2RpD9t7L1qyJOKRgGYPpkQS+uhTVxrAoJeOqxRbbmlsCSemqCZ uI9+tZRPllAZvtm2qbDl0Pc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5v+nytYwwOn88xWSs61xMplfXTQAmk9pdXYSKVxM5VKt3tB+6vxIeFtLNp/2n27cry5hs9Jw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:400f:b0:20a:9965:ef08 with SMTP id ie15-20020a17090b400f00b0020a9965ef08mr10849025pjb.155.1665966879265; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2001:ee0:500b:6370:da47:cda5:dbd5:6e77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e15-20020a17090301cf00b00185507b5ef8sm1258350plh.50.2022.10.16.17.34.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 07:34:35 +0700 From: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh To: Junio C Hamano Cc: skrab-sah via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , skrab-sah Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] abspath.h file is generated by makeheaders tool Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2022-10-16 09:51:56-0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Đoàn Trần Công Danh writes: > > > This will break cross-compilation. > > At the very least, we needs to use either HOSTCC (likes linux project), > > HOST_CC or CC_FOR_BUILD (GNU Autotools' convention) to compile > > makeheaders > > > > So, something like (not tested, whatsoever): > > I find it a bit irresponsible to leave the suggestion sounding as if > this is a good idea as long as it does not break cross-compilation, > which will (mis)lead the original poster to waste even more time on > this topic (and waste others' time on responding to it), so let me > repeat what I already said a few times. I'm sorry. I thought my earlier voice to not support this proposal was't necessary to be re-iterated. I only think that if this proposal somehow got accepted (despite I don't like this proposal), something needs to be fixed. I will be explicit next time. Thanks. -- Danh