From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A143C636CC for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230125AbjBPRZB (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:25:01 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45830 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229508AbjBPRZA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:25:00 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FD64D600 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 30145 invoked by uid 109); 16 Feb 2023 17:24:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:24:59 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 5370 invoked by uid 111); 16 Feb 2023 17:24:58 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:24:58 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:24:58 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rev-list: clarify git-log default date format Message-ID: References: <20230201155712.86577-1-rafael@dulfer.be> <230201.864js5q9sv.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:29:25AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * The same text as the previous one; only to correct the lack of > "--" at the end in v2 that broke the formatting toolchain. Thanks. I looked at this version under doc-diff as well as the HTML version and confirmed that it looks good (which I'm sure you also did at this point ;) ). -Peff