Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: me@ttaylorr.com, newren@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com,
	Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] repository: create read_replace_refs setting
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:36:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68fd5ca2-a6c2-d742-5d74-ba93c1497169@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <481a81a515efb29bc4eb0b1a09b7d1df3f3c074b.1685126618.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
> 
> The 'read_replace_refs' global specifies whether or not we should
> respect the references of the form 'refs/replace/<oid>' to replace which
> object we look up when asking for '<oid>'. This global has caused issues
> when it is not initialized properly, such as in b6551feadfd (merge-tree:
> load default git config, 2023-05-10).
> 
> To make this more robust, move its config-based initialization out of
> git_default_config and into prepare_repo_settings(). This provides a
> repository-scoped version of the 'read_replace_refs' global.

As you noted in [1], this could be clearer. I think the most confusing part
is referring to it as "a repository-scoped version of the...global" because
it implies that the global and repo-scoped setting do the same thing/take
the same precedence (when, in reality, if replace refs are disabled
globally, the config doesn't do anything). Maybe something like this would
make that clearer?

"This provides a repository-scoped configuration that's only used if replace
refs are not already disabled process-wide with the global
'read_replace_refs'."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/ae89feda-0a76-29d7-14ce-662214414638@github.com/

> 
> The global still has its purpose: it is disabled process-wide by the
> GIT_NO_REPLACE_OBJECTS environment variable or by a call to
> disable_replace_refs() in some specific Git commands.
> 
> Since we already encapsulated the use of the constant inside
> replace_refs_enabled(), we can perform the initialization inside that
> method, if necessary. This solves the problem of forgetting to check the
> config, as we will check it before returning this value.
> 
> There is an interesting behavior change possible here: we now have a
> repository-scoped understanding of this config value. Thus, if there was
> a command that recurses into submodules and might follow replace refs,
> then it would now respect the core.useReplaceRefs config value in each
> repository.
> 
> Unfortunately, the existing processes that recurse into submodules do
> not appear to follow object IDs to their contents, so this behavior
> change is not visible in the current implementation. It is something
> valuable for future behavior changes.

AFAIK, the only '--recurse-submodules' commands that recurse in-process are
'ls-files' and 'grep'. However, 'grep' does call 'parse_object_or_die()',
which (further down in the call stack) calls 'lookup_replace_object()'.
Maybe I'm misreading and the replaced object isn't actually used, but could
'git grep --recurse-submodules' be used to test this?

> @@ -94,5 +94,14 @@ void disable_replace_refs(void)
>  
>  int replace_refs_enabled(struct repository *r)
>  {
> -	return read_replace_refs;
> +	if (!read_replace_refs)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (r->gitdir) {
> +		prepare_repo_settings(r);
> +		return r->settings.read_replace_refs;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* repository has no objects or refs. */
> +	return 0;
>  }

This implementation matches the intent outlined in this patch/the cover
letter:

- if replace refs are disabled process-wide, always return 0
- if the gitdir is present, return the value of 'core.usereplacerefs'
- if there's no gitdir, there's no repository set up (and therefore no
  config to read/objects to replace), so return 0

I was a bit unsure about whether 'r->gitdir' was the right check to make,
but it's consistent with other gates to 'prepare_repo_settings()' (e.g.
those added in 059fda19021 (checkout/fetch/pull/pack-objects: allow `-h`
outside a repository, 2022-02-08)), so I'm happy with it.

> diff --git a/repo-settings.c b/repo-settings.c
> index 1df0320bf33..5a7c990300d 100644
> --- a/repo-settings.c
> +++ b/repo-settings.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ void prepare_repo_settings(struct repository *r)
>  	repo_cfg_bool(r, "pack.usebitmapboundarytraversal",
>  		      &r->settings.pack_use_bitmap_boundary_traversal,
>  		      r->settings.pack_use_bitmap_boundary_traversal);
> +	repo_cfg_bool(r, "core.usereplacerefs", &r->settings.read_replace_refs, 1);

This defaults to enabling replace refs, consistent with the (intended)
behavior prior to this series. Good!

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX variable is special in that
> diff --git a/repository.h b/repository.h
> index c42f7ab6bdc..13fefa540bc 100644
> --- a/repository.h
> +++ b/repository.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ struct repo_settings {
>  	int pack_read_reverse_index;
>  	int pack_use_bitmap_boundary_traversal;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Do replace refs need to be checked this run?  This variable is
> +	 * initialized to true unless --no-replace-object is used or
> +	 * $GIT_NO_REPLACE_OBJECTS is set, but is set to false by some
> +	 * commands that do not want replace references to be active.
> +	 */
> +	int read_replace_refs;

I don't think this comment is accurate anymore, since the repo-scoped
'read_replace_refs' value is determined *only* by the 'core.usereplacerefs'
config. It's 'replace_refs_enabled()' that makes the overall determination
(taking into account 'GIT_NO_REPLACE_OBJECTS'/'--no-replace-object').

> +
>  	struct fsmonitor_settings *fsmonitor; /* lazily loaded */
>  
>  	int index_version;


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-26 18:43 [PATCH 0/3] Create stronger guard rails on replace refs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-05-26 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] repository: create disable_replace_refs() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-05-31  4:41   ` Elijah Newren
2023-05-31 13:37     ` Derrick Stolee
2023-06-01 17:47       ` Jeff King
2023-06-03  0:28         ` Junio C Hamano
2023-06-04  6:32           ` Jeff King
2023-06-01  5:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-06-01 16:35   ` Victoria Dye
2023-05-26 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] replace-objects: create wrapper around setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-01 16:35   ` Victoria Dye
2023-06-01 19:50     ` Derrick Stolee
2023-06-03  1:47       ` Elijah Newren
2023-06-05 15:44         ` Derrick Stolee
2023-05-26 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] repository: create read_replace_refs setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-01 16:36   ` Victoria Dye [this message]
2023-06-01 19:52     ` Derrick Stolee
2023-05-31  5:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] Create stronger guard rails on replace refs Elijah Newren
2023-06-02 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-02 14:29   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] repository: create disable_replace_refs() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-02 14:29   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] replace-objects: create wrapper around setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-03  6:22     ` René Scharfe
2023-06-05 13:22       ` Derrick Stolee
2023-06-02 14:29   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] repository: create read_replace_refs setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-05 19:32     ` Victoria Dye
2023-06-03  1:52   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Create stronger guard rails on replace refs Elijah Newren
2023-06-06 13:24   ` [PATCH v3 " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-06 13:24     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] repository: create disable_replace_refs() Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-06 13:24     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] replace-objects: create wrapper around setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-06 13:24     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] repository: create read_replace_refs setting Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2023-06-06 16:15     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Create stronger guard rails on replace refs Victoria Dye
2023-06-12 20:45     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68fd5ca2-a6c2-d742-5d74-ba93c1497169@github.com \
    --to=vdye@github.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).