Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Calvin Wan <calvinwan@google.com>, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add C TAP harness
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 09:46:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64513039b4f8b_1ba2d2948c@chronos.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFySSZCQfeGnrMPKHwsrT+UvaH_+t=nGhUPUtdVuijOmrrWejA@mail.gmail.com>

Calvin Wan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:15 PM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Calvin
> >
> > On 27/04/2023 18:50, Calvin Wan wrote:
> > > Introduces the C TAP harness from https://github.com/rra/c-tap-harness/
> > >
> > > There is also more complete documentation at
> > > https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/c-tap-harness/
> >
> > I'm afraid this reply is rather briefer than I'd like but I'm short of
> > time and about to go off-list for a couple of weeks. My ideal unit test
> > library would

> >   - allow named tests (this maybe more trouble that it is worth as I
> >     think it inevitably leads to more boilerplate code calling the named
> >     tests)
> 
> I'm not quite sure what you're referring to with "named tests". Could
> you clarify (possibly with an example)?

Many test frameworks have a way of specifying a name for a test case, for
example in JavaScript's QUnit:

  test('basic test case', t => {
    t.is('actual', 'expected');
  });

In this case "basic test case" is the name of the test case.

In git's testing framework:

  test_expect_success 'basic test case' '
    echo actual > actual &&
    echo expected > expected &&
    test_cmp actual expected
  '

When running this test case the TAP output would be:

  ok 1 - basic test case

Other testing frameworks report on a per-assertion basis, for example Perl's
Test::More:

  is('actual', 'expected', 'assertion check');

These are more like named assertions rather than named test cases.

The example of what you proposed shows:

  ok(unit_test(), "unit test runs successfully");

Which is similar to Test::More, so it seems it runs on a concept of assertions
rather than test cases.

That's what I presume Phillip meant.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-27 17:50 [RFC PATCH 0/2] add an external testing library for unit tests Calvin Wan
2023-04-27 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Add C TAP harness Calvin Wan
2023-04-27 18:29   ` SZEDER Gábor
2023-04-27 18:38     ` Calvin Wan
2023-04-27 20:15   ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-28 16:31     ` Calvin Wan
2023-05-02 15:46       ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2023-05-10 15:46       ` Phillip Wood
2023-05-11 23:16         ` Glen Choo
2023-05-18 10:04           ` Phillip Wood
2023-06-21 15:57         ` Linus Arver
2023-06-26 13:15           ` Phillip Wood
2023-06-28 21:17             ` Linus Arver
2023-06-29  5:52             ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-06-30  9:48               ` Phillip Wood
2023-05-02 15:54     ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-02 16:39       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-05-02 18:11         ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-02 16:34     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-05-10  8:18       ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-27 17:50 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] unit test: add basic example Calvin Wan
2023-04-27 18:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-02 15:58     ` Felipe Contreras
2023-04-27 18:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] add an external testing library for unit tests Junio C Hamano
2023-04-27 18:46   ` Calvin Wan
2023-04-27 21:35 ` brian m. carlson
2023-05-02  4:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-02 13:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-05-02 15:28   ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64513039b4f8b_1ba2d2948c@chronos.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=calvinwan@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).