From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] fetch: pass through `fetch_config` directly
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:17:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230522191730.GA365027@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZGsuy6T_yiK4qxxJ@ncase>
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > If the point is that fetch_config may start carrying new information,
> > wouldn't we want to pass it as a whole down to display_state_init()? It
> > might eventually want to see some of that other config, too.
> >
> > It's presumably academic for now, and it would not be too hard to change
> > later if needed, so I don't know that it's worth a re-roll. I just found
> > it especially funny here since the purpose of the patch is to treat the
> > config struct as a single unit.
>
> Well, I decided against passing in the full configuration as it feels a
> bit like a layering violation: the other code really is about the fetch
> itself, while this code here is only about display logic. So passing in
> the `fetch_config` felt weird to me, even more so because we continue to
> only need that single value at the end of this series. I do see your
> point though.
>
> Given that none of your other comments require a reroll I'll leave this
> as-is for now. Thanks for your review!
Yeah, I could see that line of thinking, as well. Leaving sounds good to
me. And I think that was my only substantive comment on the whole
series, so we can consider the whole reviewed-by: me.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-17 11:48 [PATCH 0/9] fetch: smallish cleanups Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-17 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] fetch: drop unused DISPLAY_FORMAT_UNKNOWN enum value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-19 0:13 ` Jeff King
2023-05-17 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] fetch: drop unneeded NULL-check for `remote_ref` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-19 0:13 ` Jeff King
2023-05-17 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] fetch: pass through `fetch_config` directly Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-19 0:18 ` Jeff King
2023-05-22 8:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-22 19:17 ` Jeff King [this message]
2023-05-17 11:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "fetch.prune" value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-19 0:21 ` Jeff King
2023-05-17 11:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "fetch.pruneTags" value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-17 11:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "fetch.showForcedUpdates" value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-17 11:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "fetch.recurseSubmodules" value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-17 11:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "fetch.parallel" value Patrick Steinhardt
2023-05-17 11:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] fetch: use `fetch_config` to store "submodule.fetchJobs" value Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230522191730.GA365027@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).