From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A7FC77B71 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229801AbjDOI7X (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:59:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229845AbjDOI7W (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:59:22 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22475902E for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 01:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28567 invoked by uid 109); 15 Apr 2023 08:59:18 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:59:18 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 3055 invoked by uid 111); 15 Apr 2023 08:59:18 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:59:18 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:59:18 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Thomas Bock Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Weird behavior of 'git log --before' or 'git log --date-order': Commits from 2011 are treated to be before 1980 Message-ID: <20230415085918.GA679010@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <7728e059-d58d-cce7-c011-fbc16eb22fb9@cs.uni-saarland.de> <20230415085207.GA656008@coredump.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230415085207.GA656008@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 04:52:07AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > There may be also cases where the two diverge. Obviously having two Sorry, my ability to type is going rapidly downhill this evening. I meant to say "there may be other cases where the two diverge". I.e., the best way to be sure they behave the same is to make them share code. -Peff