fio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@gmail.com>
To: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: fio - write benchmark help requested
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:01:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMBkX3d4d2ex+pTnS9iGL+uqbdaGKL3MYnt_HRhORAoosf07PQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello All,

I am emailing here to understand how fio can be used to benchmark
writes in synchronous and asynchronous mode. I have wasted some time
in running some benchmarks the wrong way. I am sending this email in
the hopes that someone can throw light my way.

As I understand it, unless "direct = 1", synchronous write will occur
in the page cache and thus will not show the storage device's write
bandwidth.
--------------------------------
*Synchronous writes that reflect the device bandwidth/iops can be
performed in two ways:

ioengine = sync,
direct = 1
buffered =0

OR

ioengine = libaio/io_uring
direct = 1
iodepth = 1
-------------------------------------

Asynchronous writes that reflect the device bandwidth/iops can be
performed in the following ways:

ioengine = libaio
direct = 1
iodepth = "x"
io_batch = "y" [where y < x ]

or

ioengine = io_uring
direct = 1
iodepth = "x"
iodepth_batch = "y" [where y < x ]

If I want to maximize the requests that get sent to the device, I can
specify a huge iodepth number. The Linux kernel will then keep sending
the device the maximum I/O requests that the device can accept (true
queue depth of the storage device).

However, I am not sure how to control the actual queue depth when that
is not the case.
If I want the CMR drive (my storage device) to consistently get 4
requests at a time:
setting iodepth = 4 will not control it. This will only control that
the device will have at a maximum 4 requests at a time, but it cannot
control the minimum.

Is this understanding correct?

Best Regards,
Surbhi

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-12-13  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMBkX3d4d2ex+pTnS9iGL+uqbdaGKL3MYnt_HRhORAoosf07PQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=csurbhi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).