dri-devel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
	Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>,
	zhiguojiang <justinjiang@vivo.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"opensource.kernel@vivo.com" <opensource.kernel@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmabuf: fix dmabuf file poll uaf issue
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 14:21:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <facb101b-3535-421d-bffb-c4ea675c9107@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0fe95949d4f41449f17add8300270b9@AcuMS.aculab.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1783 bytes --]

Am 08.05.24 um 13:51 schrieb David Laight:
> From: Christian König
>> Sent: 07 May 2024 15:05
> ...
>> I actually have been telling people to (ab)use the epoll behavior to
>> check if two file descriptors point to the same underlying file when
>> KCMP isn't available.
> In what way?

Something like this:

fd_e = epoll_create1(EPOLL_CLOEXEC);

tmp = dup(fd_A)
epoll_ctl(fd_e, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, tmp, ....);
dup2(fd_B, tmp);

/* If this return -EEXISTS then the fd_A and fd_B are pointing to the 
same struct file */
epoll_ctl(fd_e, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, tmp, ....);

close (tmp);
close (fd_e


> You can add both fd to the same epoll fd.
> Relying on the implicit EPOLL_CTL_DEL not happening until both fd are
> closed is a recipe for disaster.
> (And I can't see an obvious way of testing it.)
>
> Q6/A6 on epoll(7) should always have had a caveat that it is an
> 'implementation detail' and shouldn't be relied on.
> (it is written as a 'beware of' ...)
>
> The other point is that there are two ways to get multiple fd that
> reference the same underlying file.
> dup() fork() etc share the file offset, but open("/dev/fd/n") adds
> a reference count later and has a separate file offset.

No it doesn't.

Accessing /dev/fd/n or /proc/*/fd/n ideally accesses the same inode, but 
gives you a new struct file.

dup(), fork() etc.. make you actually reference the same struct file 
inside the kernel.

That turned out to be a rather important distinction when working with 
device drivers and DMA-buf.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> I don't know which structure epoll is using, but I suspect it is
> the former.
> So it may not tell you what you want to know.
>
> 	David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3102 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27  2:29 [PATCH] dmabuf: fix dmabuf file poll uaf issue Zhiguo Jiang
2024-03-29 23:36 ` T.J. Mercier
2024-04-01  6:52   ` zhiguojiang
2024-04-01 12:22 ` Christian König
2024-04-02  6:49   ` zhiguojiang
2024-04-02  8:07     ` Christian König
2024-04-02 18:22       ` T.J. Mercier
2024-04-12  6:19         ` zhiguojiang
2024-04-12  6:39           ` Christian König
2024-04-15 10:35             ` zhiguojiang
2024-04-15 11:57               ` Christian König
2024-04-18  1:33                 ` zhiguojiang
2024-04-18  6:46                   ` Christian König
2024-05-03 13:40                     ` Charan Teja Kalla
2024-05-03 23:13                       ` T.J. Mercier
2024-05-05 16:20                         ` Charan Teja Kalla
2024-05-06  9:30                           ` Charan Teja Kalla
2024-05-06 19:04                             ` T.J. Mercier
2024-05-07 10:10                               ` Christian König
2024-05-07 13:39                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-07 14:04                                   ` Christian König
2024-05-07 18:00                                     ` T.J. Mercier
2024-05-07 20:19                                       ` Rob Clark
2024-05-08 11:51                                     ` David Laight
2024-05-08 12:21                                       ` Christian König [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=facb101b-3535-421d-bffb-c4ea675c9107@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=justinjiang@vivo.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opensource.kernel@vivo.com \
    --cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tjmercier@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).