From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F381DC48BDF for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8ECB613D4 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:00:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B8ECB613D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=zary.sk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870246EA94; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hosting.gsystem.sk (hosting.gsystem.sk [212.5.213.30]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92136EA94; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (188-167-68-178.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.68.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hosting.gsystem.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B87917A025C; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:00:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Ondrej Zary To: Christian =?utf-8?q?K=C3=B6nig?= Subject: Re: nouveau broken on Riva TNT2 in 5.13.0-rc4: NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_sync_for_device Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:00:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <202106052143.52488.linux@zary.sk> <202106090910.51188.linux@zary.sk> <762c1044-6e3a-48fc-95e4-1730b6ef2a2e@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <762c1044-6e3a-48fc-95e4-1730b6ef2a2e@amd.com> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <202106092200.08088.linux@zary.sk> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wednesday 09 June 2021 11:21:05 Christian K=C3=B6nig wrote: > Am 09.06.21 um 09:10 schrieb Ondrej Zary: > > On Wednesday 09 June 2021, Christian K=C3=B6nig wrote: > >> Am 09.06.21 um 08:57 schrieb Ondrej Zary: > >>> [SNIP] > >>>> Thanks for the heads up. So the problem with my patch is already fix= ed, > >>>> isn't it? > >>> The NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_wr16 introduced in > >>> 141b15e59175aa174ca1f7596188bd15a7ca17ba was fixed by > >>> aea656b0d05ec5b8ed5beb2f94c4dd42ea834e9d. > >>> > >>> That's the bug I hit when bisecting the original problem: > >>> NULL pointer dereference in nouveau_bo_sync_for_device > >>> It's caused by: > >>> # first bad commit: [e34b8feeaa4b65725b25f49c9b08a0f8707e8e86] drm/tt= m: merge ttm_dma_tt back into ttm_tt > >> Good that I've asked :) > >> > >> Ok that's a bit strange. e34b8feeaa4b65725b25f49c9b08a0f8707e8e86 was > >> created mostly automated. > >> > >> Do you have the original backtrace of that NULL pointer deref once mor= e? > > The original backtrace is here: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outl= ook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flkml.org%2Flkml%2F2021%2F6%2F5%2F350&data= =3D04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Ce905b6bd2aa842ace15508d92b15b96d%= 7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637588195000729460%7CUnknown%7= CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn= 0%3D%7C3000&sdata=3DzFqheBbJcOHtYgqG%2Fs63AT1dwuk4REmUDJWHvzaLAlc%3D&am= p;reserved=3D0 >=20 > And the problem is that ttm_dma->dma_address is NULL, right? Mhm, I=20 > don't see how that can happen since nouveau is using ttm_sg_tt_init(). >=20 > Apart from that what nouveau does here is rather questionable since you=20 > need a coherent architecture for most things anyway, but that's not what= =20 > we are trying to fix here. >=20 > Can you try to narrow down if ttm_sg_tt_init is called before calling=20 > this function for the tt object in question? ttm_sg_tt_init is not called: [ 12.150124] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 31 MiB [ 12.150133] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: GART: 128 MiB [ 12.150143] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: BMP version 5.6 [ 12.150151] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: No DCB data found in VBIOS [ 12.151362] ttm_tt_init [ 12.151370] ttm_tt_init_fields [ 12.151374] ttm_tt_alloc_page_directory [ 12.151615] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000 =2D-=20 Ondrej Zary