From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/20] cpufreq: exynos: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:09:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534C4E76.6000905@semaphore.gr> (raw)
The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index f99cfe2..0e19bce 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -28,18 +28,18 @@ static unsigned int locking_frequency;
static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq)
{
- struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
- int index;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *freq_table;
- for (index = 0;
- freq_table[index].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; index++)
- if (freq_table[index].frequency == freq)
+ freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
+ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, freq_table) {
+ if (pos->frequency == freq)
break;
+ }
- if (freq_table[index].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
+ if (pos->frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
return -EINVAL;
- return index;
+ return pos - freq_table;
}
static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq)
--
1.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-14 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-14 21:09 Stratos Karafotis [this message]
2014-04-15 5:39 ` [PATCH 07/20] cpufreq: exynos: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534C4E76.6000905@semaphore.gr \
--to=stratosk@semaphore.gr \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).