Containers Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] openat2: reject RESOLVE_BENEATH|RESOLVE_IN_ROOT
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027235044.5240-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> (raw)

This was an oversight in the original implementation, as it makes no
sense to specify both scoping flags to the same openat2(2) invocation
(before this patch, the result of such an invocation was equivalent to
RESOLVE_IN_ROOT being ignored).

This is a userspace-visible ABI change, but the only user of openat2(2)
at the moment is LXC which doesn't specify both flags and so no
userspace programs will break as a result.

Changelog:
  v2: Split patch so as to separate selftest changes. [Shuah Khan]
  v1: <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201007103608.17349-1-cyphar@cyphar.com/>

Aleksa Sarai (2):
  openat2: reject RESOLVE_BENEATH|RESOLVE_IN_ROOT
  selftests: openat2: add RESOLVE_ conflict test

 fs/open.c                                      | 4 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/openat2/openat2_test.c | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.29.0

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-27 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-27 23:50 Aleksa Sarai [this message]
2020-10-27 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] openat2: reject RESOLVE_BENEATH|RESOLVE_IN_ROOT Aleksa Sarai
2020-10-27 23:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests: openat2: add RESOLVE_ conflict test Aleksa Sarai
2020-12-02 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] openat2: reject RESOLVE_BENEATH|RESOLVE_IN_ROOT Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201027235044.5240-1-cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --to=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).