From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] Searching for repeated source code with SmPL?
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 11:30:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76bfe0a4-50dc-4169-b02e-79b3fe7bdd0e@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2405121114580.6747@hadrien>
>> I expect here that specific source code starts a known statement list.
>
> Coccinelle takes a pattern expressed as a CTL formula and every node in
> the control flow graph and tries to match the pattern at each node.
> The matching at one node is independent of the matching at another node.
> If there are conflicting matches that result in conflicting transformations,
> then it generates an error message.
Do we stumble on conflicts for more desirable data processing also
according to involved computation tree logic variants?
The mentioned nodes should occasionally mark the beginning
and a corresponding end of a code sequence.
Will code sequences (as statement lists in the discussed test case)
become better supported in the way as known units (or building blocks)?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-12 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-06 10:08 [cocci] Searching for repeated source code with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2024-05-06 10:09 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-06 11:03 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-06 12:10 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-06 12:16 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-06 12:40 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-11 15:36 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-11 16:04 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-11 16:35 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-11 16:37 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-11 17:02 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-11 17:12 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-11 17:21 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-11 17:33 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 6:48 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 7:34 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 8:01 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 8:10 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 8:33 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 9:17 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 9:30 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2024-05-13 9:34 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 11:24 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 12:53 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 13:07 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 13:13 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-12 13:22 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 14:51 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-12 14:57 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-11 7:15 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-22 8:20 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-22 8:24 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-22 8:44 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-22 13:12 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-22 15:34 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-22 16:06 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76bfe0a4-50dc-4169-b02e-79b3fe7bdd0e@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).