cgroups.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>
To: longman@redhat.com, pauld@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	prarit@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@smile.fr>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/7] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure to adjust affinity for dynamic CPU isolation
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 22:04:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240516190437.3545310-2-costa.shul@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516190437.3545310-1-costa.shul@redhat.com>

Introduce infrastructure function housekeeping_update() to change
housekeeping_cpumask during runtime and adjust affinities of depended
subsystems.

Affinity adjustments of subsystems follow in subsequent patches.

Parent patch:
"sched/isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks"
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229021414.508972-2-longman@redhat.com/

Test example for cgroup2:

cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
echo +cpuset > cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir test
echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
echo $isolate > test/cpuset.cpus

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 948b9ee0dc2cc..036e48f0e7d1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -116,6 +116,39 @@ static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
 		     housekeeping_staging);
 }
 
+/*
+ * housekeeping_update - change housekeeping.cpumasks[type] and propagate the
+ * change.
+ *
+ * Assuming cpuset_mutex is held in sched_partition_write or
+ * cpuset_write_resmask.
+ */
+static int housekeeping_update(enum hk_type type, cpumask_var_t update)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct cpumask changed;
+		struct cpumask enable;
+		struct cpumask disable;
+	} *masks;
+
+	masks = kmalloc(sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!masks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+	cpumask_xor(&masks->changed, housekeeping_cpumask(type), update);
+	cpumask_and(&masks->enable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_andnot(&masks->disable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], update);
+	housekeeping.flags |= BIT(type);
+	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
+		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
+
+	kfree(masks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
@@ -314,9 +347,12 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		/*
 		 * Reset housekeeping to bootup default
 		 */
-		for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping_boot.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
-			cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
-				     housekeeping_boot.cpumasks[type]);
+		for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping_boot.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
+			int err = housekeeping_update(type, housekeeping_boot.cpumasks[type]);
+
+			if (err)
+				return err;
+		}
 
 		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping_boot.flags);
 		if (!housekeeping_boot.flags &&
@@ -344,9 +380,11 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		cpumask_andnot(tmp_mask, src_mask, isolcpus);
 		if (!cpumask_intersects(tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask))
 			return -EINVAL;	/* Invalid isolated CPUs */
-		cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], tmp_mask);
+		int err = housekeeping_update(type, tmp_mask);
+
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 	}
-	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping_boot.flags | flags);
 	excluded = true;
 	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
 		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
-- 
2.45.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-16 19:04 [PATCH v1 0/7] sched: Adjust affinity according to change of housekeeping cpumask Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-16 19:04 ` Costa Shulyupin [this message]
2024-05-17 21:37   ` [PATCH v1 1/7] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure to adjust affinity for dynamic CPU isolation Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] sched/isolation: Adjust affinity of timers according to change of housekeeping cpumask Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-17 22:39   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-17 22:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] sched/isolation: Adjust affinity of hrtimers " Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-17 23:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] sched/isolation: Adjust affinity of managed irqs " Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-18  1:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-18  1:25     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] [NOT-FOR-MERGE] test timers affinity adjustment Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] [NOT-FOR-MERGE] test timers and hrtimers " Costa Shulyupin
2024-05-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] [NOT-FOR-MERGE] test managed irqs " Costa Shulyupin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240516190437.3545310-2-costa.shul@redhat.com \
    --to=costa.shul@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).