From: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Milind Changire <mchangir@redhat.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary check for NULL in parse_longname()
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:39:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cp1m532.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3493bd1b-4982-e851-a2bc-c806889af01e@redhat.com> (Xiubo Li's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2023 08:14:19 +0800")
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> writes:
> On 9/7/23 21:39, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> Function ceph_get_inode() never returns NULL; instead it returns an
>> ERR_PTR() if something fails. Thus, the check for NULL in
>> parse_longname() useless and can be dropped.
>>
>> Fixes: dd66df0053ef ("ceph: add support for encrypted snapshot names")
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
>> ---
>> fs/ceph/crypto.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/crypto.c b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
>> index e4d5cd56a80b..7d0b9b5ccfc6 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/crypto.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/crypto.c
>> @@ -249,8 +249,6 @@ static struct inode *parse_longname(const struct inode *parent,
>> if (!dir) {
>> /* This can happen if we're not mounting cephfs on the root */
>> dir = ceph_get_inode(parent->i_sb, vino, NULL);
>> - if (!dir)
>> - dir = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> }
>> if (IS_ERR(dir))
>> dout("Can't find inode %s (%s)\n", inode_number, name);
>>
> Luis,
>
> How about moving the error check into the 'if (!dir) {}' ? Because from
> 'ceph_find_inode()' the return value shouldn't be true here. This err check
> should for 'ceph_get_inode()' only.
Yeah, you're right. Thanks, Xiubo. I'll send out v2 shortly.
Cheers,
--
Luís
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-08 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-07 13:39 [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary check for NULL in parse_longname() Luís Henriques
2023-09-08 0:14 ` Xiubo Li
2023-09-08 8:39 ` Luís Henriques [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cp1m532.fsf@suse.de \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchangir@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).