autofs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ian Kent" <raven@themaw.net>
To: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: autofs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/*/configs/*defconfig: Replace AUTOFS4_FS by AUTOFS_FS
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 15:20:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <016f771c-cfa7-4795-a0a4-9f486a5b5b0e@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sf96kk6f.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>


On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, at 2:06 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-07-29 14:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 13:01, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit a2225d931f75 ("autofs: remove left-over autofs4 stubs")
>>> promised the removal of the fs/autofs/Kconfig fragment for AUTOFS4_FS
>>> within a couple of releases, but five years later this still has not
>>> happened yet, and AUTOFS4_FS is still enabled in 63 defconfigs.
>>
>> Ok, I ran the script, and also decided that we might as well remove
>> the AUTOFS4 legacy naming stub entry by now.
>>
>> It has been five years, and people will have either picked up the new
>> name with 'make oldconfig', or they just don't use 'make oldconfig' at
>> all.
>
> I had not added the suggested the removal of AUTOFS4_FS from the Kconfig
> in my patch, because some projects seem to have have copy-pasted from
> the kernel's defconfig files, e.g. systemd[1].  Hopefully not a big deal
> for actual users, but worth mentioning.

Right, it's time to do this though.
Hopefully the systemd maintainers will post to the autofs mailing list for advice.

Ian

      reply	other threads:[~2023-07-30  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27 20:00 [PATCH] arch/*/configs/*defconfig: Replace AUTOFS4_FS by AUTOFS_FS Sven Joachim
2023-07-28  1:15 ` Ian Kent
2023-07-29 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-30  0:27   ` Ian Kent
2023-07-30  6:06   ` Sven Joachim
2023-07-30  7:20     ` Ian Kent [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=016f771c-cfa7-4795-a0a4-9f486a5b5b0e@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svenjoac@gmx.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).