ATH11K Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
To: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>,
	<ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mhi@lists.linux.dev>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] wifi: ath11k: support hibernation
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 07:42:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95c5d498-e00c-4f51-9517-1881a9b3585d@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304060932.80839-4-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>

On 3/3/2024 10:09 PM, Baochen Qiang wrote:
> Now that all infrastructure is in place and ath11k is fixed to handle all the
> corner cases, power down the ath11k firmware during suspend and power it back
> up during resume. This fixes the problem when using hibernation with ath11k PCI
> devices.
> 
> For suspend, two conditions needs to be satisfied:
>         1. since MHI channel unprepare would be done in late suspend stage,
>            ath11k needs to get all QMI-dependent things done before that stage.
>         2. and because unprepare MHI channels requires a working MHI stack,
>            ath11k is not allowed to call mhi_power_down() until that finishes.
> So the original suspend callback is separated into two parts: the first part
> handles all QMI-dependent things in suspend callback; while the second part
> powers down MHI in suspend_late callback. This is valid because kernel calls
> ath11k's suspend callback before all suspend_late callbacks, making the first
> condition happy. And because MHI devices are children of ath11k device
> (ab->dev), kernel guarantees that ath11k's suspend_late callback is called
> after QRTR's suspend_late callback, this satisfies the second condition.
> 
> Above analysis also applies to resume process. so the original resume
> callback is separated into two parts: the first part powers up MHI stack
> in resume_early callback, this guarantees MHI stack is working when
> QRTR tries to prepare MHI channels (kernel calls QRTR's resume_early callback
> after ath11k's resume_early callback, due to the child-father relationship);
> the second part waits for the completion of restart, which won't fail now
> since MHI channels are ready for use by QMI.
> 
> Another notable change is in power down path, we tell mhi_power_down() to not
> to destroy MHI devices, making it possible for QRTR to help unprepare/prepare
> MHI channels, and finally get us rid of the probe-defer issue when resume.
> 
> Also change related code due to interface changes.
> 
> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
> 
> Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com>

As was the case in the MHI patch, this looks strange. If you are adding
Kalle's SOB just because he was a proxy for v1, please remove it. But if
Kalle provided significant modifications then you should add a
Co-developed-by: tag.

/jeff


      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04  6:09 [PATCH v6 0/3] wifi: ath11k: hibernation support Baochen Qiang
2024-03-04  6:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] bus: mhi: host: add mhi_power_down_keep_dev() Baochen Qiang
2024-03-04  6:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] net: qrtr: support suspend/hibernation Baochen Qiang
2024-03-04  6:09 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] wifi: ath11k: support hibernation Baochen Qiang
2024-03-04 15:42   ` Jeff Johnson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95c5d498-e00c-4f51-9517-1881a9b3585d@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_bqiang@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).