On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:11:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, patch looks sane, but it does leave me with the "what about the > 'fb_changed' case?" question. Is that case basically guaranteed to not > change any existing dpms state? None of the existing drivers turn anything on or off in the mode_set_base code; the fix I intended was purely for the mode_set case, which always turns on all of the connected outputs. I just screwed up and stuck it in the wrong place. -- keith.packard@intel.com