From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8BDC48BE6 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D313D6128C for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231922AbhFPHbb (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:31:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61134 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231913AbhFPHb0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:31:26 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4029145672; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:29:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HsTJPVweyJU7o9JpLFFZl4NPhqK5lQLN0OIBbV OrXWw=; b=WGNQw6BBxi1X/njzi+S5pd/Si6m5qBQIaeEVrX/CccG1RwdYUn3cv9 U2vLICSLsQyp+igFwfBiYgVnF3OdpmrlQ+uwioL4AnEuTEu+1RggDcZRnMfTCE2P ngedTpxRDuuuTG+hJPxxZ/ybEChtupW5ugrdgjXz7GwkgnJu04iVQ= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9AD145671; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:29:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5827D14566F; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 03:29:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , Bagas Sanjaya , Jeff King , ZheNing Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] [GSOC][RFC] cat-file: reuse ref-filter logic References: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:29:12 +0900 In-Reply-To: (ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:28:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8D1AA4BA-CE74-11EB-AC00-FA9E2DDBB1FC-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget" writes: > This patch series make cat-file reuse ref-filter logic, which based on > 5a5b5f78 ([GSOC] ref-filter: add %(rest) atom) Hmph, does anybody have 5a5b5f78? The way to deal with this and avoid resending the same patches (assuming that this is not a 9-patch series, but only 5 of them are new) is to rebase your topic on 723bc66d (ref-filter: add %(rest) atom, 2021-06-09), which will allow you to discard the 4 earlier patches, and force push, with base set to 723bc66d, I think, but I am not a GGG user, so there may need an extra step or two on top of that.