* [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
@ 2014-03-06 17:34 Soren Brinkmann
2014-03-10 3:53 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Soren Brinkmann @ 2014-03-06 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: cpufreq, linux-kernel, linux-pm, Soren Brinkmann
Reformat a printk statement to:
- use pr_warn
- bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index cb003a6b72c8..534c2df608ed 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1874,11 +1874,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!gov)
return -EINVAL;
else {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s governor failed, too long"
- " transition latency of HW, fallback"
- " to %s governor\n",
- policy->governor->name,
- gov->name);
+ pr_warn("%s governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to %s governor\n",
+ policy->governor->name, gov->name);
policy->governor = gov;
}
}
--
1.9.0.1.g4196000
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
2014-03-06 17:34 [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement Soren Brinkmann
@ 2014-03-10 3:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-10 4:07 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-03-10 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Soren Brinkmann
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Reformat a printk statement to:
> - use pr_warn
> - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
> grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
>
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index cb003a6b72c8..534c2df608ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1874,11 +1874,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!gov)
> return -EINVAL;
> else {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s governor failed, too long"
> - " transition latency of HW, fallback"
> - " to %s governor\n",
> - policy->governor->name,
> - gov->name);
> + pr_warn("%s governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to %s governor\n",
> + policy->governor->name, gov->name);
> policy->governor = gov;
> }
> }
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
2014-03-10 3:53 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2014-03-10 4:07 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-10 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-03-10 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Soren Brinkmann, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:53 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > Reformat a printk statement to:
> > - use pr_warn
> > - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
> > grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
[]
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
A more comprehensive patch would be to:
Add missing newlines
Coalesce format fragments
Convert printks to pr_<level>
Align arguments
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 56b7b1b..c2d06e9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu)
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
if (!policy || IS_ERR(policy->clk)) {
- pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n", __func__,
- policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
+ pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n",
+ __func__, policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
return 0;
}
@@ -254,15 +254,15 @@ static void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci)
if (!l_p_j_ref_freq) {
l_p_j_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
l_p_j_ref_freq = ci->old;
- pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; "
- "freq is %u kHz\n", l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
+ pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; freq is %u kHz\n",
+ l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
}
if ((val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) ||
(val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq,
ci->new);
- pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu "
- "for frequency %u kHz\n", loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
+ pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu for frequency %u kHz\n",
+ loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
}
}
#else
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
freqs->flags = cpufreq_driver->flags;
pr_debug("notification %u of frequency transition to %u kHz\n",
- state, freqs->new);
+ state, freqs->new);
switch (state) {
@@ -294,9 +294,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
if ((policy) && (policy->cpu == freqs->cpu) &&
(policy->cur) && (policy->cur != freqs->old)) {
- pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is"
- " %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz.\n",
- freqs->old, policy->cur);
+ pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz\n",
+ freqs->old, policy->cur);
freqs->old = policy->cur;
}
}
@@ -307,8 +306,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE:
adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
- pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu", (unsigned long)freqs->new,
- (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
+ pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu\n",
+ (unsigned long)freqs->new, (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
trace_cpu_frequency(freqs->new, freqs->cpu);
srcu_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list,
CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
@@ -368,13 +367,13 @@ static ssize_t store_boost(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
return -EINVAL;
if (cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(enable)) {
- pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n", __func__,
- enable ? "enable" : "disable");
+ pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n",
+ __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable");
return -EINVAL;
}
- pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n", __func__,
- enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+ pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n",
+ __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
return count;
}
@@ -1184,7 +1183,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
if (gov) {
policy->governor = gov;
pr_debug("Restoring governor %s for cpu %d\n",
- policy->governor->name, cpu);
+ policy->governor->name, cpu);
}
#endif
@@ -1263,7 +1262,7 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
if (ret) {
- pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
@@ -1331,7 +1330,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
if (!frozen) {
pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
- __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
+ __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
}
}
}
@@ -1371,7 +1370,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n",
- __func__);
+ __func__);
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1399,7 +1398,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
(ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))) {
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n",
- __func__);
+ __func__);
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1456,8 +1455,8 @@ static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int old_freq,
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
unsigned long flags;
- pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing "
- "core thinks of %u, is %u kHz.\n", old_freq, new_freq);
+ pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing core thinks of %u, is %u kHz\n",
+ old_freq, new_freq);
freqs.old = old_freq;
freqs.new = new_freq;
@@ -1598,8 +1597,8 @@ static int cpufreq_bp_suspend(void)
if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) {
ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(policy);
if (ret)
- printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend "
- "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
+ pr_err("suspend failed in ->suspend step on CPU %u\n",
+ policy->cpu);
}
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
@@ -1636,8 +1635,8 @@ static void cpufreq_bp_resume(void)
if (cpufreq_driver->resume) {
ret = cpufreq_driver->resume(policy);
if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: resume failed in ->resume "
- "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
+ pr_err("resume failed in ->resume step on CPU %u\n",
+ policy->cpu);
goto fail;
}
}
@@ -1767,7 +1766,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
target_freq = policy->min;
pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n",
- policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
+ policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
/*
* This might look like a redundant call as we are checking it again
@@ -1812,8 +1811,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
freqs.flags = 0;
pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
- __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
- freqs.new);
+ __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
@@ -1822,7 +1820,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
if (retval)
pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
- __func__, retval);
+ __func__, retval);
if (notify)
cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, &freqs, retval);
@@ -1874,11 +1872,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (!gov)
return -EINVAL;
else {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s governor failed, too long"
- " transition latency of HW, fallback"
- " to %s governor\n",
- policy->governor->name,
- gov->name);
+ pr_warn("%s governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to %s governor\n",
+ policy->governor->name, gov->name);
policy->governor = gov;
}
}
@@ -1888,7 +1883,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return -EINVAL;
pr_debug("__cpufreq_governor for CPU %u, event %u\n",
- policy->cpu, event);
+ policy->cpu, event);
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
@@ -2020,8 +2015,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov;
int ret;
- pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n", new_policy->cpu,
- new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
+ pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n",
+ new_policy->cpu, new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo));
@@ -2057,7 +2052,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->max = new_policy->max;
pr_debug("new min and max freqs are %u - %u kHz\n",
- policy->min, policy->max);
+ policy->min, policy->max);
if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
policy->policy = new_policy->policy;
@@ -2145,7 +2140,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
}
if (!policy->cur) {
- pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq");
+ pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq\n");
policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
} else {
if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
@@ -2247,8 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", __func__,
- state ? "enable" : "disable");
+ pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
+ __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable");
}
return ret;
@@ -2320,7 +2315,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
ret = cpufreq_sysfs_create_file(&boost.attr);
if (ret) {
pr_err("%s: cannot register global BOOST sysfs file\n",
- __func__);
+ __func__);
goto err_null_driver;
}
}
@@ -2343,7 +2338,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
/* if all ->init() calls failed, unregister */
if (ret) {
pr_debug("no CPU initialized for driver %s\n",
- driver_data->name);
+ driver_data->name);
goto err_if_unreg;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
2014-03-10 4:07 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-03-10 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2014-03-10 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Soren Brinkmann, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
On 10 March 2014 12:07, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:53 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
>> > Reformat a printk statement to:
>> > - use pr_warn
>> > - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
>> > grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
> []
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> A more comprehensive patch would be to:
>
> Add missing newlines
> Coalesce format fragments
> Convert printks to pr_<level>
> Align arguments
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
Thanks..
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
2014-03-10 4:07 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sören Brinkmann @ 2014-03-10 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Viresh Kumar, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Hi Joe,
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 09:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:53 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > Reformat a printk statement to:
> > > - use pr_warn
> > > - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
> > > grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
> []
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> A more comprehensive patch would be to:
>
> Add missing newlines
> Coalesce format fragments
> Convert printks to pr_<level>
> Align arguments
I agree. But I didn't want to spend time on "fixing" formatting without
knowing it will be accepted. Also, I was grepping for the message I
ended up changing because on an issue I actually needed to fix.
Do you want me to squash your changes into the patch I submitted? Or do
you wanna pick up mine and submit your patch?
Thanks,
Sören
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 56b7b1b..c2d06e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu)
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
>
> if (!policy || IS_ERR(policy->clk)) {
> - pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n", __func__,
> - policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
> + pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n",
> + __func__, policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -254,15 +254,15 @@ static void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci)
> if (!l_p_j_ref_freq) {
> l_p_j_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
> l_p_j_ref_freq = ci->old;
> - pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; "
> - "freq is %u kHz\n", l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> + pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; freq is %u kHz\n",
> + l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> }
> if ((val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) ||
> (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq,
> ci->new);
> - pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu "
> - "for frequency %u kHz\n", loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
> + pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu for frequency %u kHz\n",
> + loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
> }
> }
> #else
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> freqs->flags = cpufreq_driver->flags;
> pr_debug("notification %u of frequency transition to %u kHz\n",
> - state, freqs->new);
> + state, freqs->new);
>
> switch (state) {
>
> @@ -294,9 +294,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
> if ((policy) && (policy->cpu == freqs->cpu) &&
> (policy->cur) && (policy->cur != freqs->old)) {
> - pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is"
> - " %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz.\n",
> - freqs->old, policy->cur);
> + pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz\n",
> + freqs->old, policy->cur);
> freqs->old = policy->cur;
> }
> }
> @@ -307,8 +306,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE:
> adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
> - pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu", (unsigned long)freqs->new,
> - (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
> + pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu\n",
> + (unsigned long)freqs->new, (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
> trace_cpu_frequency(freqs->new, freqs->cpu);
> srcu_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list,
> CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
> @@ -368,13 +367,13 @@ static ssize_t store_boost(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(enable)) {
> - pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n", __func__,
> - enable ? "enable" : "disable");
> + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n",
> + __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n", __func__,
> - enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n",
> + __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> return count;
> }
> @@ -1184,7 +1183,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
> if (gov) {
> policy->governor = gov;
> pr_debug("Restoring governor %s for cpu %d\n",
> - policy->governor->name, cpu);
> + policy->governor->name, cpu);
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -1263,7 +1262,7 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>
> down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
> @@ -1331,7 +1330,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
>
> if (!frozen) {
> pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
> - __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
> + __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1371,7 +1370,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -1399,7 +1398,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
> (ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -1456,8 +1455,8 @@ static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int old_freq,
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing "
> - "core thinks of %u, is %u kHz.\n", old_freq, new_freq);
> + pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing core thinks of %u, is %u kHz\n",
> + old_freq, new_freq);
>
> freqs.old = old_freq;
> freqs.new = new_freq;
> @@ -1598,8 +1597,8 @@ static int cpufreq_bp_suspend(void)
> if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) {
> ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(policy);
> if (ret)
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend "
> - "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
> + pr_err("suspend failed in ->suspend step on CPU %u\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> }
>
> cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> @@ -1636,8 +1635,8 @@ static void cpufreq_bp_resume(void)
> if (cpufreq_driver->resume) {
> ret = cpufreq_driver->resume(policy);
> if (ret) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: resume failed in ->resume "
> - "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
> + pr_err("resume failed in ->resume step on CPU %u\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> goto fail;
> }
> }
> @@ -1767,7 +1766,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> target_freq = policy->min;
>
> pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n",
> - policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
> + policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
>
> /*
> * This might look like a redundant call as we are checking it again
> @@ -1812,8 +1811,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> freqs.flags = 0;
>
> pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> - __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
> - freqs.new);
> + __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
> CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> @@ -1822,7 +1820,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> if (retval)
> pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
> - __func__, retval);
> + __func__, retval);
>
> if (notify)
> cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, &freqs, retval);
> @@ -1874,11 +1872,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!gov)
> return -EINVAL;
> else {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s governor failed, too long"
> - " transition latency of HW, fallback"
> - " to %s governor\n",
> - policy->governor->name,
> - gov->name);
> + pr_warn("%s governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to %s governor\n",
> + policy->governor->name, gov->name);
> policy->governor = gov;
> }
> }
> @@ -1888,7 +1883,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> pr_debug("__cpufreq_governor for CPU %u, event %u\n",
> - policy->cpu, event);
> + policy->cpu, event);
>
> mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
> if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
> @@ -2020,8 +2015,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov;
> int ret;
>
> - pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n", new_policy->cpu,
> - new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
> + pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n",
> + new_policy->cpu, new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
>
> memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo));
>
> @@ -2057,7 +2052,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> policy->max = new_policy->max;
>
> pr_debug("new min and max freqs are %u - %u kHz\n",
> - policy->min, policy->max);
> + policy->min, policy->max);
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> policy->policy = new_policy->policy;
> @@ -2145,7 +2140,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> if (!policy->cur) {
> - pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq");
> + pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq\n");
> policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
> } else {
> if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
> @@ -2247,8 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> - pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", __func__,
> - state ? "enable" : "disable");
> + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
> + __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable");
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -2320,7 +2315,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> ret = cpufreq_sysfs_create_file(&boost.attr);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: cannot register global BOOST sysfs file\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> goto err_null_driver;
> }
> }
> @@ -2343,7 +2338,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> /* if all ->init() calls failed, unregister */
> if (ret) {
> pr_debug("no CPU initialized for driver %s\n",
> - driver_data->name);
> + driver_data->name);
> goto err_if_unreg;
> }
> }
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
@ 2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sören Brinkmann @ 2014-03-10 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Joe Perches
Cc: Viresh Kumar, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Hi Joe,
On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 09:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:53 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > Reformat a printk statement to:
> > > - use pr_warn
> > > - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
> > > grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
> []
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> A more comprehensive patch would be to:
>
> Add missing newlines
> Coalesce format fragments
> Convert printks to pr_<level>
> Align arguments
I agree. But I didn't want to spend time on "fixing" formatting without
knowing it will be accepted. Also, I was grepping for the message I
ended up changing because on an issue I actually needed to fix.
Do you want me to squash your changes into the patch I submitted? Or do
you wanna pick up mine and submit your patch?
Thanks,
Sören
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 56b7b1b..c2d06e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -181,8 +181,8 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu)
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
>
> if (!policy || IS_ERR(policy->clk)) {
> - pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n", __func__,
> - policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
> + pr_err("%s: No %s associated to cpu: %d\n",
> + __func__, policy ? "clk" : "policy", cpu);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -254,15 +254,15 @@ static void adjust_jiffies(unsigned long val, struct cpufreq_freqs *ci)
> if (!l_p_j_ref_freq) {
> l_p_j_ref = loops_per_jiffy;
> l_p_j_ref_freq = ci->old;
> - pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; "
> - "freq is %u kHz\n", l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> + pr_debug("saving %lu as reference value for loops_per_jiffy; freq is %u kHz\n",
> + l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq);
> }
> if ((val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && ci->old != ci->new) ||
> (val == CPUFREQ_RESUMECHANGE || val == CPUFREQ_SUSPENDCHANGE)) {
> loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq,
> ci->new);
> - pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu "
> - "for frequency %u kHz\n", loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
> + pr_debug("scaling loops_per_jiffy to %lu for frequency %u kHz\n",
> + loops_per_jiffy, ci->new);
> }
> }
> #else
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> freqs->flags = cpufreq_driver->flags;
> pr_debug("notification %u of frequency transition to %u kHz\n",
> - state, freqs->new);
> + state, freqs->new);
>
> switch (state) {
>
> @@ -294,9 +294,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
> if ((policy) && (policy->cpu == freqs->cpu) &&
> (policy->cur) && (policy->cur != freqs->old)) {
> - pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is"
> - " %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz.\n",
> - freqs->old, policy->cur);
> + pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency is %u, cpufreq assumed %u kHz\n",
> + freqs->old, policy->cur);
> freqs->old = policy->cur;
> }
> }
> @@ -307,8 +306,8 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> case CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE:
> adjust_jiffies(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
> - pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu", (unsigned long)freqs->new,
> - (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
> + pr_debug("FREQ: %lu - CPU: %lu\n",
> + (unsigned long)freqs->new, (unsigned long)freqs->cpu);
> trace_cpu_frequency(freqs->new, freqs->cpu);
> srcu_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list,
> CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE, freqs);
> @@ -368,13 +367,13 @@ static ssize_t store_boost(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(enable)) {
> - pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n", __func__,
> - enable ? "enable" : "disable");
> + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST!\n",
> + __func__, enable ? "enable" : "disable");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n", __func__,
> - enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + pr_debug("%s: cpufreq BOOST %s\n",
> + __func__, enable ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> return count;
> }
> @@ -1184,7 +1183,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
> if (gov) {
> policy->governor = gov;
> pr_debug("Restoring governor %s for cpu %d\n",
> - policy->governor->name, cpu);
> + policy->governor->name, cpu);
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -1263,7 +1262,7 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d", __func__, ret);
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to move kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>
> down_write(&policy->rwsem);
> cpumask_set_cpu(old_cpu, policy->cpus);
> @@ -1331,7 +1330,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
>
> if (!frozen) {
> pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
> - __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
> + __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1371,7 +1370,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to exit governor\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -1399,7 +1398,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> if ((ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)) ||
> (ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -1456,8 +1455,8 @@ static void cpufreq_out_of_sync(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int old_freq,
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing "
> - "core thinks of %u, is %u kHz.\n", old_freq, new_freq);
> + pr_debug("Warning: CPU frequency out of sync: cpufreq and timing core thinks of %u, is %u kHz\n",
> + old_freq, new_freq);
>
> freqs.old = old_freq;
> freqs.new = new_freq;
> @@ -1598,8 +1597,8 @@ static int cpufreq_bp_suspend(void)
> if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) {
> ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(policy);
> if (ret)
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend "
> - "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
> + pr_err("suspend failed in ->suspend step on CPU %u\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> }
>
> cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> @@ -1636,8 +1635,8 @@ static void cpufreq_bp_resume(void)
> if (cpufreq_driver->resume) {
> ret = cpufreq_driver->resume(policy);
> if (ret) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: resume failed in ->resume "
> - "step on CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);
> + pr_err("resume failed in ->resume step on CPU %u\n",
> + policy->cpu);
> goto fail;
> }
> }
> @@ -1767,7 +1766,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> target_freq = policy->min;
>
> pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n",
> - policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
> + policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
>
> /*
> * This might look like a redundant call as we are checking it again
> @@ -1812,8 +1811,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> freqs.flags = 0;
>
> pr_debug("%s: cpu: %d, oldfreq: %u, new freq: %u\n",
> - __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old,
> - freqs.new);
> + __func__, policy->cpu, freqs.old, freqs.new);
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs,
> CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> @@ -1822,7 +1820,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> retval = cpufreq_driver->target_index(policy, index);
> if (retval)
> pr_err("%s: Failed to change cpu frequency: %d\n",
> - __func__, retval);
> + __func__, retval);
>
> if (notify)
> cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, &freqs, retval);
> @@ -1874,11 +1872,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!gov)
> return -EINVAL;
> else {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s governor failed, too long"
> - " transition latency of HW, fallback"
> - " to %s governor\n",
> - policy->governor->name,
> - gov->name);
> + pr_warn("%s governor failed, too long transition latency of HW, fallback to %s governor\n",
> + policy->governor->name, gov->name);
> policy->governor = gov;
> }
> }
> @@ -1888,7 +1883,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> pr_debug("__cpufreq_governor for CPU %u, event %u\n",
> - policy->cpu, event);
> + policy->cpu, event);
>
> mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
> if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
> @@ -2020,8 +2015,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov;
> int ret;
>
> - pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n", new_policy->cpu,
> - new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
> + pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n",
> + new_policy->cpu, new_policy->min, new_policy->max);
>
> memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo));
>
> @@ -2057,7 +2052,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> policy->max = new_policy->max;
>
> pr_debug("new min and max freqs are %u - %u kHz\n",
> - policy->min, policy->max);
> + policy->min, policy->max);
>
> if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
> policy->policy = new_policy->policy;
> @@ -2145,7 +2140,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> if (!policy->cur) {
> - pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq");
> + pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq\n");
> policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
> } else {
> if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
> @@ -2247,8 +2242,8 @@ int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled = !state;
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> - pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n", __func__,
> - state ? "enable" : "disable");
> + pr_err("%s: Cannot %s BOOST\n",
> + __func__, state ? "enable" : "disable");
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -2320,7 +2315,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> ret = cpufreq_sysfs_create_file(&boost.attr);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: cannot register global BOOST sysfs file\n",
> - __func__);
> + __func__);
> goto err_null_driver;
> }
> }
> @@ -2343,7 +2338,7 @@ int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data)
> /* if all ->init() calls failed, unregister */
> if (ret) {
> pr_debug("no CPU initialized for driver %s\n",
> - driver_data->name);
> + driver_data->name);
> goto err_if_unreg;
> }
> }
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
(?)
@ 2014-03-10 16:49 ` Joe Perches
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-03-10 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Sören Brinkmann
Cc: Viresh Kumar, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 09:35 -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Joe,
Hello Sören:
> On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 09:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 11:53 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 7 March 2014 01:34, Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > > Reformat a printk statement to:
> > > > - use pr_warn
> > > > - bring the whole string into a single line in favor of being able to
> > > > grep for the message (ignoring the 80 char limit)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
> > []
> > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> >
> > A more comprehensive patch would be to:
> >
> > Add missing newlines
> > Coalesce format fragments
> > Convert printks to pr_<level>
> > Align arguments
>
> I agree. But I didn't want to spend time on "fixing" formatting without
> knowing it will be accepted. Also, I was grepping for the message I
> ended up changing because on an issue I actually needed to fix.
>
> Do you want me to squash your changes into the patch I submitted? Or do
> you wanna pick up mine and submit your patch?
What I sent incorporates your change.
If Viresh or Rafael want me to sign it, I will,
Original-patch-by: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
otherwise, feel free to resend it with your signature.
cheers, Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-10 16:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-06 17:34 [PATCH] cpufreq: Reformat printk() statement Soren Brinkmann
2014-03-10 3:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-10 4:07 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-10 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-03-10 16:35 ` Sören Brinkmann
2014-03-10 16:49 ` Joe Perches
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.