From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E46C2B9F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A86611C1 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 16:49:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 05A86611C1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=amsat.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsplt-0002kw-7x for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:49:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lspkx-0001OP-RB; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:48:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:40566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lspkv-00016p-Qo; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:48:11 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id y7so15251398wrh.7; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RgAEWXV5nmKU4Q3sRG1D5iVG3H2VEgfGtqlH75QAXBU=; b=h7VmdlcDOytExUrn1YjBWVrOg6lNRTwrJFPNja3CZHs7NzUw+33TvJXpfmlSit/uj8 f+tx6rsEzEbwSHPMF5qDvcSZX//62/NM+r6HmZZ3iyJKg6iPMhSuQVZeG0jNepgjrPY2 MrUvTv9GM/Re0cIx0OBBCh9D8WUbTNZ2Ol0a1od2Fv2c5uq1CBFVh5Nr6EqQ0JkKDvb3 8oO3cRHPapgLigcaBAugF8bRxUij6KzNSzxNiV1FaKaZFMO3810krEuwF2zIV7kWAloM LKbNuAyoAReSdp3LgqF3qA/np5gOy+m6qHh/fOaSqtGbR8FrB7BixxUvTzXURMvZRCrj iSJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RgAEWXV5nmKU4Q3sRG1D5iVG3H2VEgfGtqlH75QAXBU=; b=RDLHYji1H2bnspgXZdvKMcjpOHEhNnbKL6cyVlC4L1Eo45vX6XzSTaQRU+ZPpGVzWM PqbdhVAMxT8Pb4AJgc6W7EMmBSpUp7nJ3WGPE9wSLpHXWMVx8XRFlZ8SpDkuv9JF2rT2 eGRvrBOmuYjy8AASifocDz07iGweoBIE6y6TpkEx7sdmKzgrbf5vG3VEeAbApUxW19I8 lz/RPxPVcL5Qae+Y4K+YOSj8L8y0u2OXaJ8/KiEghKt4+3dAxOOp3FQhlfZwHc5ruqYZ ojODniClHGsmfzp+v5XzAyNM17XAmzuwaqXM/63U37bLiby5X3xSXDaQ73g2Lqk5YdZ2 oR+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530t7kd0IPX7ebM18evxP2IuRXOd14pC7UYqlUvup0oFz19dvNWE o1A1VkwF+xxE5K1D+vkBnxQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGD1dcQVbUhdISGbMyJUfgw0bxvrSI3JC4s2zsJ06qz2wb8l18ikOsCk6bgbAFfbkqxzkH0A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:540a:: with SMTP id g10mr20087578wrv.254.1623689287677; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (93.red-83-35-24.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.35.24.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x125sm14643733wmg.37.2021.06.14.09.48.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv To: BALATON Zoltan References: <20200623063123.20776-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <46692025-50b-2734-e394-513b2761b979@eik.bme.hu> <8230aaa5-73b4-4bf6-6567-38bb5cde3883@amsat.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 18:48:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.489, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Corey Minyard , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 6/14/21 12:02 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 6/12/21 9:33 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>>> This is v2 of Zoltan's patch: >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg714711.html >>>> >>>> - rebased >>>> - added docstring >>>> - include hw/misc/auxbus.c fix >>>> >>>> Supersedes: <20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu> >>> >>> What happened to this series? I did not find it in patchew, only my >>> original patch: >>> >>> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu/ >>> >>> I still have this in one of my branches so I think it was not merged at >>> the end. Could this be resurrected or should I forget about it and live >>> with the inconsistency in parameters instead? >> >> I suppose it was not queued because you asked to remove the >> "Reported-by" tag :/ I agree with you it would be nice to get this in >> the tree > > I think I said only Reported-by is enough no need for Suggested-by as > well but I don't see this as a reason to drop these patches. So maybe > just nobody cared enough. Ah OK now got it. >> for good. However 1 year passed, so it might need adjustment. > > Should I try to rebase it or will you do it eventually? Found the branch and clean rebase, so no change needed. Corey, if you are busy, I could send a pull request if you provide and Acked-by tag. Regards, Phil.