From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5CEC433EF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343756AbiAGANk (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 19:13:40 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:37655 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232819AbiAGANj (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 19:13:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1641514390; bh=EyPi8Y3Gc+gTu2ILQBh3edI82bKKE2zEKRdiyUFahW4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=RcqA07djH1Kg19mjjHZT9kQEF5PBB0i+eBHqAXaC6T9NjHBCkybTynF/giLuDnIBk o1hL4kgES4Z+FDB0zoVkVRjNS/wyuVImH+OQgV2PL8ZzWlZMoLIAl+pPrvfVK52dtb Xsa+hpVlC6iKG5amEr6vxBqPsdcEcJXZXxPodJTY= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([149.28.201.231]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MStCe-1mxUEN0uR4-00UK15; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 01:13:10 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:13:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages Content-Language: en-US To: Neal Gompa Cc: Christophe Leroy , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Btrfs BTRFS , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Hector Martin References: <6c7a6762-6bec-842b-70b4-4a53297687d1@gmx.com> From: Qu Wenruo In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:anCYYKhzpZMxqykyFCq+8YxKtyr10cQ84WLxzimaPuneijGdCqz DCTt+qxKufcuCSCYh5BvF0kfQ7B0Ov4gS934FXjKQjR28CPsyZEYGntV8kpnaTxozhsyQRC PmkBHzOARVbxjBbf8Gsxv62DXHnI2kJv+jLn2ZfjzaKplUnXZJaOCfBKAPin1Ic1yimFXpN iHdKDG80XWbzbUv4D+TQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HhiphtxHIBA=:jKABz3jdZsxi6EwxEaeBRz /vugjzSA51qNzCKgJwvYaZa2YSql73GgHl83okMs26BXff4nbudCZBsGEKWxwZXwfbG6X0RCc 7ZqRNly6LqVLWdgP03qj0D3t1BR7lzWByjCbE6zAdXaLVodjh6K75ihOiNQO2WBfyDz7qnmcX mlPLUhIFTKDlZU6FgKxB8bUHGLSNKRPnqaaBDPdzs7Rv+xggVOMbyz+/CfbrSRdQxnmiMXjTv dnsN+qmcMtklx2FKtAht9pdsgmGOB1HrHc5WUuGfOdEreSYKmRmjztIrtWoR9eHws0Dzbz7zN 465Xbz9zbOPnEfp4Y+8HhJe9S1QeBOD1Ex0TFoVfrA9TGaSgApBs9Po5dC8H2Ia0vAxmlqOWZ ik9jJHgVDg6m/6jPVQTF20+blPD1aQ8osdqUTz+8DROWqjJD2QzSHRTb9ZuGBQRW3lCkNJ1FK zkNrPJXv0xpY4Lx4oAlUZECuudUudNJNQv+/41YIb+DeMq51xYqYntsNRKMMdqEak/NhbtIdI e8VE4TVb/5f2Ylvu+6OD85RxjdcbVT5a9rq1YT0LAh/O899lnI00oz5NWppzgstdqCW/iD49R 8qTZ5bx3jU1NEDjnUH/7qFeX5V9UdB/HC4puVARS23Z7FFf7iZ+YtfV0Ga3wDYqcbDsUfWP75 +3vXsOOZN7SgtMCI88jFddjtWd6RtMIX1NlXny5YhphJrOtSANWJstJp1qOuGKAYaoxx/MBMH 7GfknbMczRPnhbprQ1Z68yC1wTkUnOhBs3f5d60ruWjSoJcccxt/cles38CuRyuP3z8V/Sqzp 8V+3J6T7c7SaBTcXJjLCKVx/6jCZTK3rHzewI6iC04ioXD4TKgZGw8cGl8PYBf5JDzYYVp0if 4tc9RiHfvCrFnhJ3DFB3oLDICGDWS7OR5Spz19FI7sN6suUSGMjHvEkwIbd+SBoC7ZCKYle6L Er/fry33el3L1GNK6G4UH0ABvT5k0o1L1NUu9enWZ13N8Tg/QemjSkEm+ZlRXtPtIZLZGPP25 DPa/jDJ6GD1G1N8iAXD8pf8hLJD1wYQ7ElBvUlj05p6amX4OB7/VyDfCFUE90ZyzHhB9yWgn2 Hha+O/UqdMb8Nc= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/1/7 00:31, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> Hi Christophe, >> >> I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current >> branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. >> >> But unfortunately my current test environment can only provide page siz= e >> with 64K or 4K, no 16K or 128K/256K support. >> >> Mind to test my new branch on 128K page size systems? >> (256K page size support is still lacking though, which will be addresse= d >> in the future) >> >> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/metadata_subpage_switch >> > > The Linux Asahi folks have a 16K page environment (M1 Macs)... Su Yue kindly helped me testing 16K page size, and it's pretty OK there. So I'm not that concerned. It's 128K page size that I'm a little concerned, and I have not machine supporting that large page size to do the test. Thanks, Qu > > Hector, could you look at it too? > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 084EBC433F5 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JVP4D24mCz30MK for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 11:19:56 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=f6fQjpoW; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmx.com (client-ip=212.227.15.15; helo=mout.gmx.net; envelope-from=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=f6fQjpoW; dkim-atps=neutral X-Greylist: delayed 330 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at boromir; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:19:15 AEDT Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JVP3R2rvRz2x9G for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 11:19:14 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1641514744; bh=EyPi8Y3Gc+gTu2ILQBh3edI82bKKE2zEKRdiyUFahW4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=f6fQjpoWAZtZ3bTC3ttU7oRM71zxarXaRNGOFvakmye6wOeX/o/FYCDJZblf+AJr9 VS1qfmKyPiUVRmXWDY0x87gUu7rGXBr33rdmOO4sQ9bqn8VJwP3LtnDXdPdT0pswi4 PA1hb1YiKxmFWwQPPR/LwtFoAwoW4EXljTZBdpgA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([149.28.201.231]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MStCe-1mxUEN0uR4-00UK15; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 01:13:10 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 08:13:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: Disable BTRFS on platforms having 256K pages Content-Language: en-US To: Neal Gompa References: <6c7a6762-6bec-842b-70b4-4a53297687d1@gmx.com> From: Qu Wenruo In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:anCYYKhzpZMxqykyFCq+8YxKtyr10cQ84WLxzimaPuneijGdCqz DCTt+qxKufcuCSCYh5BvF0kfQ7B0Ov4gS934FXjKQjR28CPsyZEYGntV8kpnaTxozhsyQRC PmkBHzOARVbxjBbf8Gsxv62DXHnI2kJv+jLn2ZfjzaKplUnXZJaOCfBKAPin1Ic1yimFXpN iHdKDG80XWbzbUv4D+TQg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:/XiueiDLzmo=:DyLgDEzc1bS6uoCMd3pKaE nu20UT8/Gr1E9Dw3cqLjfb6DChegSoY/HMAcisopK7RY4NL6x3FwY/EwLJJLAFwmzzM5QKvW7 OebA20FB4eV6lGz5RE2+SfvOpfmwzmdirbsscf2MOsnlC6jKQcmcUUKH1X2xkO/cbkHL4sPxv XOASNmxpn+bCX+ULWpL6QjYAzi4dcOCspIjlOcxRoIeWRzDdU/3b1U+pxx/Xc6GOouIYghGP8 j8a6TGhyBswn9oaF1D7AdBsp1Hs+eMDcp2urCGrBY7+YEQgS86acYywPnqdVVzstbStKffPl+ Ua62O24XV2JVm/w1J38bnh/8I9VXWmjyxFFuEGev82haCdqwCdQXre3W3zVJhPwntbP+lrMmb ewu1Wupj16d1Rqkh+uQ/wN9qirgFvZcRoZymP9DbhFF6zUOMkrBQ3FY41w91zBFJb9emq8RKi 1dieGTlKA4sh/r8GmkoxxK04GBuJBIz94BnZM4ZKLIa6WC3KPRvn8januseX7f177fHoKzgyS okc/Qg6sdzeGWGwx3RA8RaFvBS6A8hpCDVBJkGIoQgHmUWmRotYqwQ52F8Poa5TxMLFzCuXXs K6HI965l2hRWRTgDKRNBFuc3OR0Ii/VKbhvl6m/POEkO4H+3lFHJtXO/lS3uHgveE//HcuIRy YcN1RbeqneGn26oGSXd+4DU1HoQ0s6syHtbAajcSNZoIqoR5DPPOeN2HZ2HU1H7ve7MxlQzef GMnUDBY8koLgGLP9jwCcF+WcOnFVwAz7FjTulZlDhXld/QvmG4LXVkQxbdBnT5DFz2ol0GmyW lK+6dKUy97BWHIA4nvP4WRfTUbGw0ZWWIHycLN+IFLvO2UU3vYg0MwWZpT9n0+GVFMpwXKPIP 5ohPg41DuJQpWVJHnz68wD/xT8k56SjVJHXdNPq9pNbRvdaMEIhcR/KGVCH9ZFlCUwbQiU73e ys1Q7rz7J2xwQUQixF8VKp5X4wI1zf/3EtpIEnlrkWxGiS+9omTd98gYZQhbK3dpGsH9ajvJf J2iw8z0FRcDmPjodQhXggVd1Gg5r1lHQ0eF1NmD6XjLJuy5m8DChNSSa0bRWN0Hc4MfxCE4KY 5GM56UOf0Tea/M= X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Hector Martin , Josef Bacik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Mason , David Sterba , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Btrfs BTRFS Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2022/1/7 00:31, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:05 AM Qu Wenruo wrote: >> >> Hi Christophe, >> >> I'm recently enhancing the subpage support for btrfs, and my current >> branch should solve the problem for btrfs to support larger page sizes. >> >> But unfortunately my current test environment can only provide page siz= e >> with 64K or 4K, no 16K or 128K/256K support. >> >> Mind to test my new branch on 128K page size systems? >> (256K page size support is still lacking though, which will be addresse= d >> in the future) >> >> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/metadata_subpage_switch >> > > The Linux Asahi folks have a 16K page environment (M1 Macs)... Su Yue kindly helped me testing 16K page size, and it's pretty OK there. So I'm not that concerned. It's 128K page size that I'm a little concerned, and I have not machine supporting that large page size to do the test. Thanks, Qu > > Hector, could you look at it too? > > >