From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B734314295 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 01:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711675063; cv=none; b=Gbb+79q5qyhXhwH7I1atogWLM+tl5REDsYMxSmlgflWchCK85wo8GIurebQKOAyO2zZ6Ecv/KRl2wlN2NYr9rmEZO1PFg4SUdtRg4pS6c3Ohu0lieXhz5nSqyCK4E28v+NYlWcMXJEcowwqebzvdX2Irf6YlXDeyavXIWJk5NbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711675063; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BOZc0/jAEZbB0ZGr6+0rh+EPBLF663vG5NRDE/hDkLo=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Message-ID:Date; b=Drr3JL1xeYdAAbMCR+O0waFhc5sfPZMGkhAj34TxA30dPJn9b4T34Bua8EPZmM80v/IjdKS7ZA+Dr5j69JS+/ImGau8+baJbDw3MNgKqLnAkvJ2oOkItRHBDjifPG7llZME8odPWMmITinrj6e57V62IAvrbecU+n17dSEF0mIs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=211.75.126.72 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.78 with qID 42T1HZBq83136626, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36506.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.95/5.92) with ESMTPS id 42T1HZBq83136626 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:17:35 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36506.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:17:35 +0800 Received: from [127.0.1.1] (172.21.69.94) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:17:35 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Ping-Ke Shih , CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: rtw88: station mode only for SDIO chips In-Reply-To: <20240327004155.7172-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20240327004155.7172-1-pkshih@realtek.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:17:35 +0800 X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > Since only station mode has been tested on SDIO chips, only keep it support > for SDIO chips to reflect correct supported features. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87wmpu1do6.fsf@kernel.org/T/#t > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/36972ff5-0c48-4bd2-8f9a-9649bfa24225@lexina.in/ > Cc: Martin Blumenstingl > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih > Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl 1 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks. a54b7a7c773b wifi: rtw88: station mode only for SDIO chips --- https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git