All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 217965] ext4(?) regression since 6.5.0 on sata hdd
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 20:27:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-217965-13602-olhSE5cbcu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-217965-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217965

denk@post.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |denk@post.com

--- Comment #67 from denk@post.com ---
Hi,

I just stumbled upon this issue, which it seems is the same I am suffering from
on a Raspberry Pi 5. Th e OS is Arch Linux ARM and linux-rpi 6.6.20 running on
a NVME SSD. After reading this issue, I checked the ext4 mount options and
found stripe=8191. As a first test I downgraded linux-rpi to 6.1.69 and my
issue of a CPU hogging kworker process, when pulling and creating docker
containers did not happen anymore. With kernel 6.6.20 and all earlier 6.6.x
versions, docker operations were really slow, in some cases pulling and
recreating a container took over 1000 seconds. With kernel 6.1.69 these
operations are back to normal speed.
As a next step I would like to try to set stripe=0. What is the right approach
here, as I am a bit unsure. Is it ok to remount the running system partition
with mount -o remount,stripe=0 <dev> without any risks for a first test? And to
change permanently to stripe=0,id it ok and sufficient to run tune2fs -f -E
stride=0 <dev> on the mounted system partition without any risks? I would be
thankful for a helping hand here to not do anything wrong or dangerous. 

I hope, that this works around my issue for now, until a fix has been found for
this. Thank you very much for looking into this!

Kind regards
denk

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-12 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02  8:10 [Bug 217965] New: ext4(?) regression since 6.5.0 on sata hdd bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-02  8:52 ` [Bug 217965] " bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-02  8:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-02  8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-02 15:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-02 15:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-03  6:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-03  6:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-03 11:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-03 13:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-03 14:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-04 12:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-04 17:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-11  7:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-11 16:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-11 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-17 10:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-17 10:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-20 10:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-21 10:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-13 22:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-14  5:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-14  6:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-14  8:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-14 10:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-15  4:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-15 17:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-15 22:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16  3:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16  4:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16  4:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16  4:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16 19:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17  0:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17  0:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17  1:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17  1:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17 15:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17 23:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17 23:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17 23:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-18 12:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-18 13:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-20  6:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-20  8:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-27 17:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-03  7:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-15 11:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-23  0:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-23  1:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-23 12:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-23 14:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-23 15:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 20:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 21:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 22:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 22:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 23:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-12-29 23:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-02  4:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-02  6:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-04  5:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-04 22:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-06  2:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-06  3:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-01-07  2:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-07 11:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-03-12 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2024-03-17 11:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-03-18  4:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-03-20  6:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-03-23  8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-217965-13602-olhSE5cbcu@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.