From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB669C04FF6 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=ZlSEtxog; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VLSXn2T3Sz3cX7 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:31:21 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=ZlSEtxog; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.73.55; helo=sin.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [145.40.73.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VLSWy0pYQz3btX for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:30:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA7FCE19BC for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD719C072AA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:30:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713515434; bh=vyrFQZasVDNOe4i8f3TbNx6gayPwVIM/2GzMTogmosQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZlSEtxogoFUisqRUWo+1OmKYKaUzCuB6cqjK8fRYwv8fp6Z9Y8Ugu3htkesnIM8Se 2NQ+oH8JIkTC1OaSlmukFT9u+JxmWp3oA/4RAbQ9B4dp3c70mH6hFnvNLtxs5D8WLm vcph5L9fdHpDwsKuWA05YDyCMzsz5fgF3lqqiTGYHMWYCHViWS8ZCA8SwzLWETE7qh x/HOrHnYFMykJNSBNYqZBcRQvBmoEj2X3D0epEzK/dDg7z1Fed0aZXocJPqdgB2BSz sTQBTRlhnuARdG+rYDX6rtDOu3S/oVMm7CCjJvLkvKBmlxLqhaoubDPRY/DdFn8K6G 8H1hPyK7JT20w== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BD458C433DE; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:30:34 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 216156] [bisected] kmemleak: Not scanning unknown object at 0xc00000007f000000 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:30:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-64 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216156 --- Comment #17 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- Just noticed the issue is still there in v6.9-rc4. Does some side effects prevented the patch to get upstream or was it overlooked? ;) [..] Page orders: linear mapping =3D 12, virtual =3D 12, io =3D 12 hash-mmu: Initializing hash mmu with SLB Linux version 6.9.0-rc4-PMacG5-dirty (root@T1000) (gcc (Gentoo 13.2.1_p2024= 0210 p14) 13.2.1 20240210, GNU ld (Gentoo 2.42 p3) 2.42.0) #1 SMP Fri Apr 19 01:23:36 CEST 2024 ioremap() called early from pmac_feature_init+0x5e8/0x12d8. Use early_iorem= ap() instead ioremap() called early from pmac_feature_init+0x1040/0x12d8. Use early_ioremap() instead Found U4 memory controller & host bridge @ 0xf8000000 revision: 0x42 Mapped at 0xc0003e0080000000 ioremap() called early from probe_one_macio+0x3e4/0x6cc. Use early_ioremap() instead Found a Shasta mac-io controller, rev: 0, mapped at 0x(____ptrval____) PowerMac motherboard: PowerMac G5 Dual Core ioremap() called early from btext_map+0x6c/0xf0. Use early_ioremap() instead ioremap() called early from iommu_init_early_dart+0x174/0xac4. Use early_ioremap() instead kmemleak: Not scanning unknown object at 0xc00000007f000000 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-PMacG5-dirty #1 Call Trace: [c0000000022f3c50] [c000000000d6524c] dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0x10c (unreliable) [c0000000022f3c80] [c000000000379118] kmemleak_no_scan+0x118/0x12c [c0000000022f3cf0] [c000000002029110] iommu_init_early_dart+0x1e4/0xac4 [c0000000022f3e00] [c00000000202a3d8] pmac_probe+0x158/0x290 [c0000000022f3e60] [c000000002011608] setup_arch+0x2b0/0xa18 [c0000000022f3f30] [c00000000200613c] start_kernel+0x98/0x81c [c0000000022f3fe0] [c00000000000c848] start_here_common+0x1c/0x20 DART table allocated at: (____ptrval____) DART IOMMU initialized for U4 type chipset Hardware name: PowerMac11,2 PPC970MP 0x440101 PowerMac printk: legacy bootconsole [udbg0] enabled CPU maps initialized for 1 thread per core (thread shift is 0) Allocated 1040 bytes for 2 pacas ----------------------------------------------------- phys_mem_size =3D 0x400000000 dcache_bsize =3D 0x80 icache_bsize =3D 0x80 cpu_features =3D 0x00000100900c218a possible =3D 0x001ffbebfbffb18f always =3D 0x0000000000000180 cpu_user_features =3D 0xdc080000 0x00000000 mmu_features =3D 0x0c008001 firmware_features =3D 0x0000000000000000 vmalloc start =3D 0xc0003d0000000000 IO start =3D 0xc0003e0000000000 vmemmap start =3D 0xc0003f0000000000 hash-mmu: ppc64_pft_size =3D 0x0 hash-mmu: htab_hash_mask =3D 0x1fffff ----------------------------------------------------- --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=