All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stsp <stsp2@yandex.ru>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: guest/host mem out of sync on core2duo?
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 12:18:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bda4611d-3ac7-de7c-44f4-f6fc5ac309f9@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YM1AWuoRm6xh+OVr@google.com>

19.06.2021 03:54, Sean Christopherson пишет:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, stsp wrote:
>> 19.06.2021 01:32, Sean Christopherson пишет:
>>> Argh!  Check out this gem:
>>>
>>> 	/*
>>> 	 *   Fix the "Accessed" bit in AR field of segment registers for older
>>> 	 * qemu binaries.
>>> 	 *   IA32 arch specifies that at the time of processor reset the
>>> 	 * "Accessed" bit in the AR field of segment registers is 1. And qemu
>>> 	 * is setting it to 0 in the userland code. This causes invalid guest
>>> 	 * state vmexit when "unrestricted guest" mode is turned on.
>>> 	 *    Fix for this setup issue in cpu_reset is being pushed in the qemu
>>> 	 * tree. Newer qemu binaries with that qemu fix would not need this
>>> 	 * kvm hack.
>>> 	 */
>>> 	if (is_unrestricted_guest(vcpu) && (seg != VCPU_SREG_LDTR))
>>> 		var->type |= 0x1; /* Accessed */
>>>
>>>
>>> KVM fixes up segs when unrestricted guest is enabled, but otherwise leaves 'em
>>> be, presumably because it has the emulator to fall back on for invalid state.
>>> Guess what's missing in the invalid state check...
>>>
>>> I think this should do it:
>> Until when will it run on an emulator in this case?  Will it be too slow
>> without a slightest hint to the user?
> KVM would emulate until the invalid state went away, i.e. until the offending
> register was loaded with a new segment that set the Accessed bit.
Such condition will happen
pretty quickly if the emulator
sets the accessed bit also in LDT.
Does it do that?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-19  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-12 22:49 guest/host mem out of sync on core2duo? stsp
2021-06-13 12:36 ` stsp
2021-06-14 17:06 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-14 17:32   ` stsp
2021-06-17 14:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-18 15:59       ` stsp
2021-06-18 21:07         ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-18 21:55           ` stsp
2021-06-18 22:06             ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-18 22:26               ` stsp
2021-06-18 22:32               ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-19  0:11                 ` stsp
2021-06-19  0:54                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-06-19  9:18                     ` stsp [this message]
2021-06-21  2:34           ` exception vs SIGALRM race (was: Re: guest/host mem out of sync on core2duo?) stsp
2021-06-21 22:33             ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-21 23:32               ` stsp
2021-06-22  0:27               ` stsp
2021-06-28 21:47                 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-28 21:50                   ` stsp
2021-06-28 22:00                   ` stsp
2021-06-28 22:27                     ` Jim Mattson
2021-07-06 16:28                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-06 22:22                         ` stsp
2021-07-06 23:41                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-23 23:38               ` exception vs SIGALRM race (with test-case now!) stsp
2021-06-24  0:11                 ` stsp
2021-06-24  0:25                   ` stsp
2021-06-24 18:05                     ` exception vs SIGALRM race on core2 CPUs (with qemu-based test-case this time!) stsp
2021-06-24 18:07                     ` stsp
2021-06-25 23:35                       ` exception vs SIGALRM race on core2 CPUs (with fix!) stsp
2021-06-26  0:15                         ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-26  0:35                           ` stsp
2021-06-26 21:50                           ` stsp
2021-06-27 12:13                           ` stsp
2021-06-26 14:03               ` exception vs SIGALRM race (another patch) stsp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bda4611d-3ac7-de7c-44f4-f6fc5ac309f9@yandex.ru \
    --to=stsp2@yandex.ru \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.