From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF365C2B9F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716F6610C8 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 10:08:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 716F6610C8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=eik.bme.hu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsjVo-0003ZO-Ix for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:08:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsjQS-0000wP-1v; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:02:36 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([2001:738:2001:2001::2001]:14641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lsjQL-00075D-Ux; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 06:02:34 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (blah.eik.bme.hu [152.66.115.182]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B2D667457ED; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id 7DDFF74570D; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6B7456E3; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:02:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:02:22 +0200 (CEST) From: BALATON Zoltan To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: Match parameters of i2c_start_transfer and i2c_send_recv In-Reply-To: <8230aaa5-73b4-4bf6-6567-38bb5cde3883@amsat.org> Message-ID: References: <20200623063123.20776-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <46692025-50b-2734-e394-513b2761b979@eik.bme.hu> <8230aaa5-73b4-4bf6-6567-38bb5cde3883@amsat.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3866299591-387435162-1623664942=:82798" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:738:2001:2001::2001; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Corey Minyard , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --3866299591-387435162-1623664942=:82798 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 6/12/21 9:33 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> This is v2 of Zoltan's patch: >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg714711.html >>> >>> - rebased >>> - added docstring >>> - include hw/misc/auxbus.c fix >>> >>> Supersedes: <20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu> >> >> What happened to this series? I did not find it in patchew, only my >> original patch: >> >> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200621145235.9E241745712@zero.eik.bme.hu/ >> >> I still have this in one of my branches so I think it was not merged at >> the end. Could this be resurrected or should I forget about it and live >> with the inconsistency in parameters instead? > > I suppose it was not queued because you asked to remove the > "Reported-by" tag :/ I agree with you it would be nice to get this in > the tree I think I said only Reported-by is enough no need for Suggested-by as well but I don't see this as a reason to drop these patches. So maybe just nobody cared enough. > for good. However 1 year passed, so it might need adjustment. Should I try to rebase it or will you do it eventually? Regards, BALATON Zoltan --3866299591-387435162-1623664942=:82798--