From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346601292E4 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711385716; cv=none; b=WALWryJRxubVG97O1nOaxSDXj40Woz1eDQv4sHv4w3HuYazrJQh2QVpEzLHpwPPi/Y7X6eOkoM974tYJyKLQxWzcHcVyhsDbjOvjmgV8hJUoy2imWNYlh469X9ZZpS9UfgQcF96npYSC1/3ta5Fq+JmEQKu6Izsm9L97AOWQKcs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711385716; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Yx67Ga5sL8d9XRVjjkCBVm7AaweJymA+Yhv8VHylsEw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=J/vTG7MtIdpfmd1/uoGLHH45DMaCTMu4tTI+yXbbMXyU0mf7zN7lXo/MR3f2RZZ07HvQMs76pdMjXQAhmzZlEOantHtPdgTlxv1qHDQmKdiTHkQcsIhXCfKPma2j3GlAG+V0Zuh33km/WR+BVNS/WyU7ybzjx0BjGyjW3gtoNsw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Y99h71vE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Y99h71vE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711385715; x=1742921715; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Yx67Ga5sL8d9XRVjjkCBVm7AaweJymA+Yhv8VHylsEw=; b=Y99h71vEvaURs20s0BhaEQOeFFf+YOXHkIh4cAodPSOigh7LNgxbAG3h gJ5LtvQ5DKjhseakkJ7xiHiTKFWPxb89NOaQKEyFk1wxjGhcLd1RNtw/U odVB0/2idZvEhuMRaV6DbGtvIb3HkJZeAd7Ju7KZjHGYwZXPXZou3ZbI9 ts7hta/oLUAeRCeRXh8u+SiSZhEOSGhlJuYHkYnGXag7A3tMP0Df5y0Pp 7Umtv/9qLGjBPxYfX25r1Qc1JdWffxnfxpQmMEVfeRlORdg9gwl33vUtN JeAaZFuA+KvUYkMrxEwfYj4X4+VQws+yIhIFPaiKMHmWSF4MeqAWwEMhz A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="6611893" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6611893" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2024 09:54:49 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="827784760" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="827784760" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.74]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2024 09:54:45 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:54:44 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:54:44 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Jani Nikula , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , lkml Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c:526 Message-ID: References: <20240227100342.GAZd2zfmYcPS_SndtO@fat_crate.local> <87jzmqjir5.fsf@intel.com> <20240227105356.GBZd2_RL9hjC_LupZB@fat_crate.local> <87h6hujhrz.fsf@intel.com> <20240325163342.GEZgGnZpROSN4euuLb@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240325163342.GEZgGnZpROSN4euuLb@fat_crate.local> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:33:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:58:08PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Let's see what Ville says, but in the end bisection might be the > > quickest way to find the regression. Though I understand it can be > > tedious for you personally. > > That still fires with 6.-9-rc1. Does Ville have any suggestions or > should I bisect? Sorry, completely missed this. The culprit is going to be commit 1de63528e728 ("drm/i915: Perform vblank evasion around legacy cursor updates") I'll cook up a fix. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel