From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5867B50A75 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387814; cv=none; b=pbjPniVFTiq7n8b6RA+RZF+BvAclLnxJx/f/69gWnjK2ol9gV9pwcWVifiu4468w7MkFq5siKEIA91O2ORYpTJrMIP3gz1ayPXcIULE9lv3jejhAOr6Dpd5WcNNXQ/a1iBw9rNfUJcdCGJ3XlzAXFsjZAKYe/zz3YIzVXQ1u5sU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711387814; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C1gj64oqzU8K3xQSmB11kUUJwdYaoF7IoZAlc1H4pL8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Rs3SJRKxWXnivzMi9TD5H7aVb98kcJcS1GnUiudhiO+keeVPUEAMGOymH5GL4BvCwZiTuLx5GznRaotWDq0TK8bPrXUcQV+V3O/AW/ZI4YxIntPbvT6qKrRjXxmsBn19yvE/vN4cgIjioJeo5xZ2xN8YHPkEmiCDIGy66uSAZgI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O7gp0UkC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O7gp0UkC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711387813; x=1742923813; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=C1gj64oqzU8K3xQSmB11kUUJwdYaoF7IoZAlc1H4pL8=; b=O7gp0UkC0kiYFhu28f3AaDxqcUHgm3zGjdpjh67XrC1X8tg7Bqa2P94X Y8tiQY+MxecEOxWCN+lZAFDvMC8DPPBaqBlFrRbTbMNmnjz34lhDKslgG TcAWDrxVoxwlYMxJiyjMDVabAPUwCJri6GR2s/Wt97sqp4myXYXFZTMyq CAT8+isnopR+trwaWsi7mwohjAhRhmNNcQpv4GoImRhgK4Zg9Qv1np5MU kVRg6p6RJKvewS1jHAgIBgW2EIBfFsrfrynVdRzlWQqfx/LD2n4yIyBJ4 VXCd7vL1lk7XE997Zn8kb0HdX9KeDgSxFKu1RGp8N/fB7G/yrfug11izs A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="10200887" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10200887" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2024 10:30:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11024"; a="827784775" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,153,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="827784775" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.74]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2024 10:30:07 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:30:06 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:30:06 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Jani Nikula , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , lkml Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c:526 Message-ID: References: <20240227100342.GAZd2zfmYcPS_SndtO@fat_crate.local> <87jzmqjir5.fsf@intel.com> <20240227105356.GBZd2_RL9hjC_LupZB@fat_crate.local> <87h6hujhrz.fsf@intel.com> <20240325163342.GEZgGnZpROSN4euuLb@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 05:33:42PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:58:08PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > Let's see what Ville says, but in the end bisection might be the > > > quickest way to find the regression. Though I understand it can be > > > tedious for you personally. > > > > That still fires with 6.-9-rc1. Does Ville have any suggestions or > > should I bisect? > > Sorry, completely missed this. The culprit is going to be > commit 1de63528e728 ("drm/i915: Perform vblank evasion around legacy > cursor updates") Hmm. Actually should be commit 0225a90981c8 ("drm/i915: Make cursor plane registers unlocked") already. Apprently I had CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=n in my config for most of my old machines. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel