From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Pearson, Robert B" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug Report] RDMA/core: test_qpex.py attempts invalid MW bind operation
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL704NdV9F15CDtQ@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d329494-6653-359b-91aa-31ac9dc8122c@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:50:20PM -0500, Pearson, Robert B wrote:
> sorry/this time without the HTML.
>
> ======================================================================
> ERROR: test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw (tests.test_qpex.QpExTestCase)
> Verify bind memory window operation using the new post_send API.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/test_qpex.py", line 292, in
> test_qp_ex_rc_bind_mw
> u.poll_cq(server.cq)
> File "/home/rpearson/src/rdma-core/tests/utils.py", line 538, in poll_cq
> raise PyverbsRDMAError('Completion status is {s}'.
> pyverbs.pyverbs_error.PyverbsRDMAError: Completion status is Memory window
> bind error. Errno: 6, No such device or address
>
> This test attempts to bind a type 2 MW to an MR that does not have bind mw
> access set and expects the test to succeed.
Does the test break after your MW series? Or will it break not-merged
code yet?
Generally speaking, we expect that developers run rdma-core tests and
fixed/extend them prior to the submission.
Thanks
>
> Bob Pearson
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 21:50 [Bug Report] RDMA/core: test_qpex.py attempts invalid MW bind operation Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 4:41 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-06-08 4:54 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 6:47 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-08 11:53 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 15:54 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:10 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 16:12 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:22 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 17:14 ` Edward Srouji
2021-06-08 17:36 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-06-08 16:46 ` Pearson, Robert B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YL704NdV9F15CDtQ@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.