From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:22:46 -0000 (GMT) From: Gary Thomas To: Tom Vier Subject: RE: egcs-1.1.1-1c bug (was Re: major ksyms problem) Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, mklinux-setup@public.lists.apple.com, mklinux-development-system@public.lists.apple.com Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On 22-Feb-99 Tom Vier wrote: > > it's an egcs bug. i think it's not aligning instructions properly, cuz > i believe the 601 is more strict about alignment. is anyone having > problems using bsd_comp.o, ppp_deflate.o, and hfs.o on a non-601 > machine built under pre-R5 (egcs-1.1.1-1c)? > > i rebuilt bsd_comp.o and ppp_deflate.o w/ egcs-1.0-2e from dr3 and > they worked perfectly. > > egcs-1.1.1-1c failed using -O0, -O2, and -O3 with all combinations of > -mcpu=601, -mcpu=604, and -fno-schedule-insns. -fpic did work, however > it addes an offset table symbol that makes insmod complain. > > is this a know problem? > >> > Feb 21 09:36:18 zero insmod: /lib/modules/2.0.37-osfmach3/net/bsd_comp.o: >> > Unhandled relocation of type 26 for .L343 > I think you need newer binutils to fix this. Try using: ftp://ftp.linuxppc.org/linuxppc/users/gdt/redhat/RPMS/ppc/binutils-2.9.1-19a.ppc.rpm ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | email: gdt@linuxppc.org | "Fine wine is a necessity of ... opinions expressed here are mine | life for me" and no one else would claim them! | | Thomas Jefferson ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]