From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2000 01:39:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [patch] take 2 Re: PG_swap_entry bug in recent kernels In-Reply-To: <200004082321.QAA01209@google.engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Kanoj Sarcar Cc: Ben LaHaise , riel@nl.linux.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Kanoj Sarcar wrote: >As I mentioned before, have you stress tested this to make sure grabbing I have stress tested the whole thing (also a few minutes ago to check the latest patch) but it never locked up so we have to think about it. Could you explain why you think it's the inverse lock ordering? Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/