From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:36:46 -0500 (EST) From: Tom Vier Reply-To: Tom Vier To: Tom Vier cc: mklinux-development-system@public.lists.apple.com, mklinux-setup@public.lists.apple.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: egcs-1.1.1-1c bug (was Re: major ksyms problem) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: it's an egcs bug. i think it's not aligning instructions properly, cuz i believe the 601 is more strict about alignment. is anyone having problems using bsd_comp.o, ppp_deflate.o, and hfs.o on a non-601 machine built under pre-R5 (egcs-1.1.1-1c)? i rebuilt bsd_comp.o and ppp_deflate.o w/ egcs-1.0-2e from dr3 and they worked perfectly. egcs-1.1.1-1c failed using -O0, -O2, and -O3 with all combinations of -mcpu=601, -mcpu=604, and -fno-schedule-insns. -fpic did work, however it addes an offset table symbol that makes insmod complain. is this a know problem? > > Feb 21 09:36:18 zero insmod: /lib/modules/2.0.37-osfmach3/net/bsd_comp.o: > > Unhandled relocation of type 26 for .L343 -- Tom Vier - 0x82B007A8 thomass@erols.com | goto the Zero Page at: Tortured Souls Software | http://www.erols.com/thomassr/zero/ [[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]] [[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]] [[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]] [[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]