All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@monkey.org>
To: "Benjamin C.R. LaHaise" <blah@kvack.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mmap<->write deadlock fix, plus bug in block_write_zero_range
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 10:08:11 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.10.9912221003380.20066-100000@funky.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991222003426.18406A-100000@kanga.kvack.org>

On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Benjamin C.R. LaHaise wrote:
> The patch to filemap.c changes filemap_nopage to use __find_page_nolock
> rather than __find_get_page which waits for the page to become unlocked
> before returning (maybe __find_get_page was meant to check PageUptodate?),
> since filemap_nopage checks PageUptodate before proceeding -- which is
> consistent with do_generic_file_read.

i've tried this before several times.  i could never get the system to
perform as well under benchmark load using find_page_nolock as when using
find_get_page. the throughput difference was about 5%, if i recall.  i
haven't explained this to myself yet.

perhaps a better fix would be to take out some of the page lock complexity
from filemap_nopage?  dunno.

	- Chuck Lever
--
corporate:	<chuckl@netscape.com>
personal:	<chucklever@netscape.net> or <cel@monkey.org>

The Linux Scalability project:
	http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/linux-scalability/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.nl.linux.org/Linux-MM/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-12-22 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-12-22  5:58 [patch] mmap<->write deadlock fix, plus bug in block_write_zero_range Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
1999-12-22 15:08 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
1999-12-22 15:43   ` Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
1999-12-22 15:58     ` Chuck Lever
1999-12-23  4:00     ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSO.4.10.9912221003380.20066-100000@funky.monkey.org \
    --to=cel@monkey.org \
    --cc=blah@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.