From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAEB17BA6; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711442814; cv=none; b=eC496dHncvMtlPZO5NQi2o4F0qZ3+e/6c2K5bxGn6PnZ1VV8IudWSIIyHMSS3P+Kzw1RQqKg/8K2WzpXP2YKnrxRy/VDdTE7p7wMLItWqBBmkp0A5XvVUfQSQ4SWLnN2gWn91teQSurP2xCk2fkILvTeXnkWWSL+tNdTyuZI2bc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711442814; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D5m0ZG9RCn4nBm+14VdPQyaCMy22RRj8GUHoQnlgo58=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=lBAukXECWJi2E7r5gDfgIyflbh6Sj8PBNucfo54lR6s3+eA0/pi+7CP7chyzr+cFoIxzMsdd0uyZYbMil/TaUkB1+7WKMIjEG6JQ9Ewb0TrEYUKlfHI2zJIjgQYXXuv7uLfvuCspsADnL+wdq8NAaI3tdyUCb6rmiWM163OleyA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MGQgDsUz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MGQgDsUz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0E4BC43390; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:46:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711442813; bh=D5m0ZG9RCn4nBm+14VdPQyaCMy22RRj8GUHoQnlgo58=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=MGQgDsUzOh85KnHUXSzUCF4JBzoNz0X/+wL6VV+TkvqUpFclLdvHhdHWI931bS3HM 7J2pB9RXs6V6jBHYMJQDuaE/9ecfso72XIRiYkTXalNdydF34/iWqaZGU2W5U08O1R JZZ25FrnP3g6bYmTBc2RNHkpxax3guUf6Gggs+9NF5y/DAI1V+VJNgmLAmXeSY2Mh6 GcUbY07QeHx2Vp17h5oC+EegH+PY6QOo27eHPP+lM/hI8sIT7sCaU6CCF9xyQ0q6i/ 2w5Vb417xg3GZWbp+mRcVauDW28h/QvRKn/NOWVRoEM58DB5Eqe14aXmV3tARLdtGU fX/jmT1lmIRPw== Received: by mail-lj1-f171.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d68651e253so84912521fa.0; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:46:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWynWRe7ScWUfkKQTb4hHojhvl7lFU1aZOJXVdQU1RxIs5Bj/1Fu9j45J2DUkPjVqKtHenZwNAh1NotRE6bKFQ0DLfjz4PLI6IZsSBt+zquVOJUkexx4lSEvI5g41VM6x8JN0uRE7O0TtFqXmTITpnrsr9Dp5hU+PFu/7acs5IKog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxFxpEB4EEE3PzyqVGTL9PHrSdR+AC7NktZsuNvBWUmXNvhw6VK bwXcfQsfcoizeQNJyms0Nsl/RFRY/5w9QI4xYT5K8ufOqmsV/I8NRXFAVLoxQ2MJXULpMLskR9r AIPEn/C/YREzWUMnNj3rqDp8lvw8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHTYZhU4AuzglO/Tss8SBqXtC85d+iybnnr6HV5QnZ2k+bE8F3ypVPeOaFi/iVVRvayMUjGaymwh3LLa5f0OmE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a4ae:0:b0:2d4:a925:d5bc with SMTP id g14-20020a2ea4ae000000b002d4a925d5bcmr5329014ljm.16.1711442812199; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240324234027.1354210-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20240324234027.1354210-34-sashal@kernel.org> <20240325010435.GA23652@lst.de> <20240326074029.GB9773@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20240326074029.GB9773@lst.de> From: Song Liu Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:46:40 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 033/238] md: implement ->set_read_only to hook into BLKROSET processing To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-raid , Li Nan Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Li Nan, Could you please look into this (back port 9674f54e41ff to older stable kernels)? If there is no clean back port, I would recommend we not do the back port. Thanks, Song On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 12:40=E2=80=AFAM Christoph Hellwig wro= te: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 07:26:43AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 02:04:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> How did we end up backporting all these block layer API changes? > > > > They were brought in as a dependency for 9674f54e41ff ("md: Don't clear > > MD_CLOSING when the raid is about to stop"). > > > > It's possible to work around bringing them during backport, but I > > preferred to bring the dependencies instead. > > I really don't see what these giant backports bring us. If people > want all the changes they'd just be better off on a modern kernel > rather than these frankenkernels. The automatic backporting is > gettind way out of hand. If the MD maintainers want > 9674f54e41ff, maybe they can send a tailor made backport?