From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86722C48BE5 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7761458 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231274AbhFOQFn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:05:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230352AbhFOQFl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:05:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327EBC061574 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id d7so3790235edx.0 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ds7scC8Pj046kGHWvqN+Gb1T/TTqW6FsBuVSLf41t9M=; b=eBCT9SjYcB+i7DBUkm4q6lmtBbVVxe7GY1h5mgDBvsAJEGyP1w0HnwaiP84SvrSq2C RlYLXGa6aUvMSwaUx48nZ2OA/c78uwpVrRWVvjW5KIqh70txCFUqLiYrSerjhAejQvex 0lZCkl50UZmfG2Lv0vxnIi693w04iOhNzawzVl1OFctxTz6aLTbXPqU2UgVXaq2YFYhX EBWqO+nhYqIQVC0p7a38KkA1yK7uAuOV3E3SHeYP7cpcUWrQUq5L+M2mUROjZBxIcsIJ /ZWVUaVF7GYZZX3mxMO0WT1qyY/wEV0YSiMTPR2V5Ai0gncCryUBaQAAV2Wpgfr9l/RX gjCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ds7scC8Pj046kGHWvqN+Gb1T/TTqW6FsBuVSLf41t9M=; b=tsW2J3eoGfkHqKQX4COLJ6gleURNuNdL3IX6iT+TMzU9q3WGTpUXWqm1qltvb7PBOi kgvdOm6/9yzVdW7BjXTYuYQn6ePamaJk1w7DHKjk0W/UPcDkK8tCGRUvQd6cDXJhr9ge 8AsOOa9xhcYaByQ2HXblbtdL0gXbxV4fWDArAuZqFP030ySmZD2MBeZJLljmqSZnGQVd zsi71tz/BkGWa94NIvyHk5aSYrFUCO7LVySfkKHAmJAdYsA+IBf5incIqcqHFe8bvX3/ PfonG9MFWIzxPbJWAyfBJZVNhIBCW6LVCZ7mZH05ocjHa5ASEpxUKF5vgGd3E74JQEag NZGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Vau2Ke+rSXwbypnInYxSiYEYzHanrTy3TbRbuYq1uyNvAj8zB UH6u+z0zNI0mJb+i4Weoe1zja4mw/esv/mvdwU3aDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS0kyJZM92AbMMzk0As5PtF3WFaVk1rdjdjo68Ucq1q8xo6X6hQnUYeIwJJmwC4w6saK9fIF9OihkCxTKcHRY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb45:: with SMTP id w5mr202254edt.170.1623773015755; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210615152840.GD11724@lx2k> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2 To: Daniel Palmer List-Id: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , SoC Team , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Romain Perier , Mohammed Billoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:01 AM Daniel Palmer wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Olof Johansson wrote: > > This time it seems like you based your branch on 5.14-rc5, which is a newer -rc > > than what we have the rest of our trees on. The general rule of thumb is to > > base it on the oldest meaningful rc for the release (rc1 or rc2, most of the > > time). We normally base our tree on rc2 or so, in this case I went forward to > > rc3 earlier. > > Sorry, I hadn't even thought of that but it makes sense. > > > (Maybe you had the same base last time around, and I missed it -- my tooling > > failed out on the S-o-b checking before I noticed) > > Last one was rc5 too. > > > To avoid another roundtrip here, I'll apply the two patches directly, but > > please keep it in mind in the future, especially once you have more material > > for a cycle. > > Thanks for doing that and the hand holding. I think I can manage to > get it right next time. :) Yeah, no worries. More or less every single maintainer has made similar mistakes at some point or other, especially during ramping up. > I have one DTS patch I would like to get into 5.14 for the watchdog > driver that was recently accepted. > Is it still ok to send a PR for that one or is it too late now? I > think I read the cut off is around rc6. You can still send it, either as a patch or as a pull request - your choice. -Olof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9492C48BE5 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F87C613B6 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:25:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8F87C613B6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fOlsrCTukxuqeqoTAfruLtun94PACg5dKOeGHByjQ0s=; b=dfMtUkIEPknq6u khb93b1zRTfvI6RpSRVwhtHKugYFLz7etPdRfJ31a/lurWurGF1nin+JDB5OKYMneJJ61bvq0ic2m rZ/ZVik7EOXIOtZfZseT1An7+NhitfjcwmyHUUeOTajXjB63+TvpDC1pfrwpYZ1q4Ru4qs713M5pN j6trpVpYqCmKtQGg9zcBeclD9BHHVdYCHYRckx9m1CVnDv4ilUQ2mbbp7nAQHqwyDlxnIXwOXpBUI U6QUecajCTyDvBKVyfN3abKssxGL7tiDiatTB8qegfy36urErczEEcfbHu/oemaHWn4Qnm964YwPt 3xJPJa8SMQPwTkIWyUAQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltFb2-002lYn-KX; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:23:41 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltBXN-001CSA-LU for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:03:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id dj8so51840364edb.6 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ds7scC8Pj046kGHWvqN+Gb1T/TTqW6FsBuVSLf41t9M=; b=eBCT9SjYcB+i7DBUkm4q6lmtBbVVxe7GY1h5mgDBvsAJEGyP1w0HnwaiP84SvrSq2C RlYLXGa6aUvMSwaUx48nZ2OA/c78uwpVrRWVvjW5KIqh70txCFUqLiYrSerjhAejQvex 0lZCkl50UZmfG2Lv0vxnIi693w04iOhNzawzVl1OFctxTz6aLTbXPqU2UgVXaq2YFYhX EBWqO+nhYqIQVC0p7a38KkA1yK7uAuOV3E3SHeYP7cpcUWrQUq5L+M2mUROjZBxIcsIJ /ZWVUaVF7GYZZX3mxMO0WT1qyY/wEV0YSiMTPR2V5Ai0gncCryUBaQAAV2Wpgfr9l/RX gjCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ds7scC8Pj046kGHWvqN+Gb1T/TTqW6FsBuVSLf41t9M=; b=QIxesCkhBEZ6rMAiAgilwmk3JHvgHjFn8MShRxg/6KOVeaX8DV34zGcs7payIJI4+s ZEh6rgAMoye4LK932QfHPHQqUs40TK8YVACu+2p3iBYXJpvZYgCePQMtnR294pwlbFP0 zs4s6uifKeJRkU6jTliodAR0lOVYgnciNToEQ7bfhaRwHSj47G7GXMjLaFxKBxbKIxlH ZMAXeyHWxrO9WY4rkPabfNb0nUxSCBv2PL8ZXDiGsNb7BGXTWVZerkXJEpMth6s/ffp1 jSoJMMPtvcZfQsBgqh/as88MT9MNq2xA/evHMaNj57cv5shIl/n8MHoQxwLhQMlcGca9 llow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319ro3q97dFvHQjDJwasVsKlWFFl8A+FgtRBBgsEqGd+gGqvc5g lJOc1isWxtO9SG6c4ytK+1mHqahcCtpk3GfPlOQy11mVlPduqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS0kyJZM92AbMMzk0As5PtF3WFaVk1rdjdjo68Ucq1q8xo6X6hQnUYeIwJJmwC4w6saK9fIF9OihkCxTKcHRY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb45:: with SMTP id w5mr202254edt.170.1623773015755; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210615152840.GD11724@lx2k> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2 To: Daniel Palmer List-Id: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , SoC Team , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Romain Perier , Mohammed Billoo X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210615_090337_765808_F013C3E4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:01 AM Daniel Palmer wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Olof Johansson wrote: > > This time it seems like you based your branch on 5.14-rc5, which is a newer -rc > > than what we have the rest of our trees on. The general rule of thumb is to > > base it on the oldest meaningful rc for the release (rc1 or rc2, most of the > > time). We normally base our tree on rc2 or so, in this case I went forward to > > rc3 earlier. > > Sorry, I hadn't even thought of that but it makes sense. > > > (Maybe you had the same base last time around, and I missed it -- my tooling > > failed out on the S-o-b checking before I noticed) > > Last one was rc5 too. > > > To avoid another roundtrip here, I'll apply the two patches directly, but > > please keep it in mind in the future, especially once you have more material > > for a cycle. > > Thanks for doing that and the hand holding. I think I can manage to > get it right next time. :) Yeah, no worries. More or less every single maintainer has made similar mistakes at some point or other, especially during ramping up. > I have one DTS patch I would like to get into 5.14 for the watchdog > driver that was recently accepted. > Is it still ok to send a PR for that one or is it too late now? I > think I read the cut off is around rc6. You can still send it, either as a patch or as a pull request - your choice. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel