All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: mkcompile_h: consider timestamp if KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is set
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:43:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAR=Fwzio6CQqDOYQJj9tYrf5a_-sYQ+Yr2=Qt5cYq8wOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQkoqTG540EOER27G83z+DO5fkeHi-in-vRYkrbX-o0cg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:05 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 11:18 PM Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > To avoid unnecessary recompilations, mkcompile_h does not regenerate
> > compile.h if just the timestamp changed.
> > Though, if KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is set, an explicit timestamp for the
> > build was requested, in which case we should not ignore it.
> >
> > If a user follows the documentation for reproducible builds [1] and
> > defines KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP as the git commit timestamp, a clean
> > build will have the correct timestamp. A subsequent cherry-pick (or
> > amend) changes the commit timestamp and if an incremental build is done
> > with a different KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP now, that new value is not taken
> > into consideration. But it should for reproducibility.
> >
> > Hence, whenever KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is explicitly set, do not ignore
> > UTS_VERSION when making a decision about whether the regenerated version
> > of compile.h should be moved into place.
> >
> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/reproducible-builds.html
> >
> > Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
> > ---
>
>
> Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks.
>

This may not be a big deal, but when KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is unset,
the timestamp is not updated.  It still has a user-specified string.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-12 14:18 [PATCH] kbuild: mkcompile_h: consider timestamp if KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is set Matthias Maennich
2021-06-17  1:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-06-17  1:43   ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2021-06-17  9:18     ` Matthias Maennich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK7LNAR=Fwzio6CQqDOYQJj9tYrf5a_-sYQ+Yr2=Qt5cYq8wOA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maennich@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.