From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc3-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:11:14 -0800 Message-ID: References: <201102032009.17100.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Keith Packard Cc: Linux SCSI List , Linux ACPI , Takashi Iwai , Carlos Mafra , Linux Wireless List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , Florian Mickler , Network Development , Dave Airlie , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Dave Airlie , Linux PM List , Maciej Rutecki List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > > The goal is to make it so that when you *do* set a mode, DPMS gets set > to ON (as the monitor will actually be "on" at that point). Here's a > patch which does the DPMS_ON precisely when setting a mode. Ok, patch looks sane, but it does leave me with the "what about the 'fb_changed' case?" question. Is that case basically guaranteed to not change any existing dpms state? > (note, this patch compiles, but is otherwise only lightly tested). Carlos? Takashi? Ignore my crazy patch, try this one instead. Does it fix things for you? Linus